Bug 1066900 - docker-registry: Make available in EPEL 7
Summary: docker-registry: Make available in EPEL 7
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: docker-registry
Version: epel7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Marek Goldmann
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1066903 1066905 1066907 1066908 1066909 1066911 epel7-redis
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-02-19 10:18 UTC by Marek Goldmann
Modified: 2014-06-18 08:18 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-18 08:18:45 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Marek Goldmann 2014-02-19 10:18:43 UTC 
This is a tracker bug.
Comment 1 Marek Goldmann 2014-02-19 10:27:21 UTC 
The docker-registry package is now built for EPEL 7, but is not usable since many requires are missing. This bug is about tracking those dependencies and make them available in EPEL 7 to make docker-registry usable.
Comment 2 Daniel Walsh 2014-05-19 21:30:54 UTC 
Well we shipped it in HTB1 so I think this is fixed now?  Lokesh? Marek?
Comment 3 Marek Goldmann 2014-05-20 09:36:18 UTC 
(In reply to Daniel Walsh from comment #2)
> Well we shipped it in HTB1 so I think this is fixed now?  Lokesh? Marek?

Did we? From what I know this is not part of RHEL, nor it was pushed to EPEL yet. I don't know where the version from HTB comes from, but I've heard Lokesh built a custom RPM.
Comment 4 Lokesh Mandvekar 2014-05-20 13:47:03 UTC 
(In reply to Marek Goldmann from comment #3)
> (In reply to Daniel Walsh from comment #2)
> > Well we shipped it in HTB1 so I think this is fixed now?  Lokesh? Marek?
> 
> Did we? From what I know this is not part of RHEL, nor it was pushed to EPEL
> yet. I don't know where the version from HTB comes from, but I've heard
> Lokesh built a custom RPM.

I did build one for RHEL-7 using this branch https://github.com/lsm5/docker-registry/tree/m2crypto . If we're shipping that, we could probably close this right away.
Comment 5 Daniel Walsh 2014-05-20 14:14:40 UTC 
Lets bring this up for conversation with Subhendu
Comment 9 Marek Goldmann 2014-06-18 08:18:45 UTC 
Closing, since docker-registry is now in RHEL.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.