Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 1082672 - connection to multiple qpidd instances is broken [NEEDINFO]
connection to multiple qpidd instances is broken
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-heat (Show other bugs)
4.0
Unspecified Unspecified
high Severity high
: z5
: 4.0
Assigned To: Steven Hardy
Amit Ugol
: ZStream
Depends On: 1036523
Blocks: RHEL-OSP_Neutron_HA 1082661 1082664 1082665 1082666 1082668 1082669 1082670 1123376
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2014-03-31 11:20 EDT by Ihar Hrachyshka
Modified: 2016-04-26 20:19 EDT (History)
18 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: openstack-heat-2013.2.3-3.el6ost
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Prior to this update, Qpid would attempt to reconnect to a broken message broker, even though multiple hosts were configured. With this update, reconnect() selects the next broker in the list for each connection attempt.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1082661
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-22 13:52:24 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
mlopes: needinfo? (shardy)

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Launchpad 1261631 None None None Never
OpenStack gerrit 67449 None None None Never
OpenStack gerrit 67450 None None None Never
OpenStack gerrit 84612 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2014:1687 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: openstack-heat security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2014-10-22 17:10:51 EDT

  None (edit)
Comment 4 Ihar Hrachyshka 2014-07-18 05:32:17 EDT 
@Steven, upstream checks fail. Can you check why? It seems that it's something about documentation not generated, but still, are there any plans to fix that in u/s? I would think that it's just a matter of cherry-picking some patch for e.g. requirements.txt or similar trivial thing.
Comment 9 Amit Ugol 2014-10-11 14:23:47 EDT 
tested on 2013.2.4-1.el6ost
Comment 10 Martin Lopes 2014-10-12 20:22:22 EDT 
Added draft doc text.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2014-10-22 13:52:24 EDT 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1687.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.