Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1083106

Summary: Provide a bit more space and/or limit length of bond names to fit in the availabel space
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Martin Pavlik <mpavlik>
Component: ovirt-nodeAssignee: Ryan Barry <rbarry>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.4.0CC: aberezin, cshao, dfediuck, fdeutsch, gklein, iheim, myakove, yaniwang, ycui, yeylon
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: 3.5.0   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: node
Fixed In Version: ovirt-node-3.0.1-18.el6_5.13 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1120063 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-02-11 20:54:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Node RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1118297, 1120063, 1123329, 1142923, 1156165    

Description Martin Pavlik 2014-04-01 13:38:02 UTC
Created attachment 881353 [details]
screenshot 1

Description of problem:
RHEV-H TUI -> Network -> Available System NICs , allow more space for bond names

Since we allow for bond names in following shape

bond+number(max 11 digits) 

TUI should be able to display them.

At the moment TUI can display only bond+3 digits see screenshot 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor release 6.5 (20140320.0.el6ev)

How reproducible:
100% 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. add RHEV-H to RHEV-M
2. create bond named "bond01234567890" on the RHEV-H host

Actual results:
At the moment TUI can display only bond+3 digits see screenshot 

Expected results:
Full bond name visible

Additional info:

Comment 1 Fabian Deutsch 2014-04-01 14:05:40 UTC
To let all the data fit in our 80x24 minimal setup we should do it the other way round and limit the maximum length of bond names, or do a mix of both (limit the length, and provide more space).

In general we should not break the 80x24 limits.

Comment 2 Ryan Barry 2014-04-01 14:40:26 UTC
Is this bond created from the RHEV-M interface? You should not have the option to create bonds from RHEV-H when managed by RHEV-M, and the attachment reflects this (disabled button).

Comment 5 Yaning Wang 2014-12-18 02:42:46 UTC
Tested on:

RHEV-H 6.6-20141212.0.el6ev
ovirt-node-3.1.0-0.34.el6



Steps to Reproduce:
1. clean install rhevh
2. add RHEV-H to RHEV-M
3. create bond named "bond01234567890" on the RHEV-H host

Actual results:
bond create successful 
Full bond name visible

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2015-02-11 20:54:53 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0160.html