Bug 1088281 - Review Request: python-scales - Stats for Python processes
Summary: Review Request: python-scales - Stats for Python processes
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1088283
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-04-16 11:06 UTC by Lubomir Rintel
Modified: 2014-04-25 13:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-25 13:11:50 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
jakub.jedelsky: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lubomir Rintel 2014-04-16 11:06:28 UTC
SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/python-scales.spec
SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/python-scales-1.0.3-1.el7.src.rpm

Description:

Tracks server state and statistics, allowing you to see what your server is
doing. It can also send metrics to Graphite for graphing or to a file for crash
forensics.

Comment 1 jakub.jedelsky 2014-04-16 21:29:44 UTC
- a newer version of py package is available (1.0.5) which is (besides other things) ready for python 3. Why don't you use this one?

- %{__python} should be %{__python2}, the same for python sitelib.
You can use python3 then.

- nose tests are available, please add %check section

- rpmlint
python-scales.spec:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 1)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Comment 3 jakub.jedelsky 2014-04-23 23:40:06 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python-scales-1.0.5-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
          python3-scales-1.0.5-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
          python-scales-1.0.5-1.fc20.src.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint python3-scales python-scales
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
python3-scales (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python3-simplejson
    python3-six

python-scales (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python-simplejson
    python-six



Provides
--------
python3-scales:
    python3-scales

python-scales:
    python-scales



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/Cue/scales/archive/c0602416b6f8c688409f811c51a2962b75e78935/scales-c0602416b6f8c688409f811c51a2962b75e78935.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 4d75793913fb850165e52ec5d3b71709c01efe899ebc53983b33db64503ee42f
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4d75793913fb850165e52ec5d3b71709c01efe899ebc53983b33db64503ee42f


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n python-scales
Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

-------------------------------

Summary: Looks good. Approved.

Comment 4 Lubomir Rintel 2014-04-25 08:45:22 UTC
Thank you.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-scales
Short Description: Stats for Python processes
Owners: lkundrak filabrazilska
Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-04-25 12:23:14 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 6 Lubomir Rintel 2014-04-25 13:11:50 UTC
Imported and built.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.