Bug 1093128 - [GSS](6.3.0) Remote client transaction timeout values are overwritten by hardcoded values
Summary: [GSS](6.3.0) Remote client transaction timeout values are overwritten by hard...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: EJB
Version: 6.1.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ER6
: EAP 6.3.0
Assignee: Ivo Studensky
QA Contact: Jan Martiska
Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1093752 1159058
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-04-30 16:56 UTC by Stephen Fikes
Modified: 2018-12-09 17:47 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
: 1093752 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-28 15:25:07 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker WFLY-2789 0 Major Resolved Remote client transaction timeout values are overwrote by hardcoded values 2017-06-28 02:49:39 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 1134833 0 None None None 2016-04-29 20:41:27 UTC

Description Stephen Fikes 2014-04-30 16:56:44 UTC 
Description of problem:
See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2789

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Ivo Studensky 2014-05-27 10:58:48 UTC 
PR sent:
https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-eap/pull/1369
Comment 2 Jan Martiska 2014-06-10 11:34:22 UTC 
Verified in EAP 6.3.0.ER7.
Comment 3 Jan Martiska 2014-07-02 08:23:59 UTC 
Hi Scott, I changed the doc to reflect that this is a bugfix, not a known issue in EAP 6.3.0. Could you make sure this change gets reflected in the next build of release notes? Thanks.
Comment 4 Stephen Fikes 2016-04-29 20:28:11 UTC 
The resolution of this issue was to change the hardcoded timeout from 300 seconds (5 minutes) to Integer.MAX_VALUE.
Comment 5 Stephen Fikes 2016-04-29 20:29:08 UTC 
See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265300 for a subsequent refinement.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.