Bug 1097685
| Summary: | [RFE] Visualize pending registration in setup TUI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Jiri Belka <jbelka> |
| Component: | RFEs | Assignee: | Andrew Cathrow <acathrow> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Shai Revivo <srevivo> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.4.0 | CC: | acathrow, bazulay, fdeutsch, gklein, iheim, lpeer, rbalakri, ycui, yeylon |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | infra | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-06-15 12:08:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Infra | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 875088, 1093884, 1135921, 1231379 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Jiri Belka
2014-05-14 10:27:14 UTC
Hi Fabian, Any suggestion to handle this one? I would suggest that this report might require BZ#1093884. What do you say? > 'Status: Virtualization hardware was detected and is enabled' > > Who cares about it? I think installation should fail completely if host HW > is not good enough for being RHEV host :) Users can enable virtualization in the host if it's disable in the BIOS after installation. (In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #1) > Hi Fabian, > > Any suggestion to handle this one? I would suggest that this report might > require BZ#1093884. What do you say? No, no suggestions. But IMO the referenced bug above is the right direction. IIUIC the information is currently not available (if registeration is pending), thus: Before we can expose/use this information in the UI it needs to be made available, which needs to be handled by vdsm-reg or it's successor - or whatever component. And further more - the vdsm_reg rewrite is currently targeted upstream for 3.5. (In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #2) > (In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #1) > > Hi Fabian, > > > > Any suggestion to handle this one? I would suggest that this report might > > require BZ#1093884. What do you say? > > No, no suggestions. But IMO the referenced bug above is the right direction. > IIUIC the information is currently not available (if registeration is > pending), thus: Before we can expose/use this information in the UI it needs > to be made available, which needs to be handled by vdsm-reg or it's > successor - or whatever component. Thanks Fabian, I do believe if ovirt-engine expose this data and any component can consult without authentication we could do it directly in ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm. |