Bug 1098071
| Summary: | Needed information in the documentation regarding managing storage node snapshots | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Operations Network | Reporter: | bkramer <bkramer> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Tyler Kelly <tkelly> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Mike Foley <mfoley> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | JON 3.2.1 | CC: | fbrychta, hrupp, snegrea, tkelly |
| Target Milestone: | post-GA | Keywords: | Documentation, Triaged |
| Target Release: | JON 3.3.2 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: |
[Admin_Config] This will require a Docs Review to ensure the KBase is current first and then upgrade docs to refer to the KBase as the canonical source.
|
|
| Last Closed: | 2017-11-06 22:05:41 UTC | Type: | Enhancement |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
bkramer
2014-05-15 08:28:11 UTC
Reassigning to John Ha. *** Bug 1099024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** My initial triage suggests linking customers to the KBase instead of repeating the info in the product docs. I would need to ensure the KBase contains correct information, and if not it might need to be cloned for 3.3 and updated. Taking ownership of JON docs bugs. Snapshots appears to be covered already: JON32 https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_jboss_operations_network/3.2/html/admin_and_config/storage-backup-restore#storage-maint JON33 https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_jboss_operations_network/3.3/html/admin_and_config/storage-backup-restore#storage-maint Likely that this bug was just missed. Adding needsinfo is this existing section sufficient? |