RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1103253 - Rebase RHEL 7.1 to 2014.1.98 (from nss 3.16.1, for FF 31)
Summary: Rebase RHEL 7.1 to 2014.1.98 (from nss 3.16.1, for FF 31)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ca-certificates
Version: 7.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account)
QA Contact: Aleš Mareček
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1079056 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1085467 1085469 1140729
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-05-30 14:25 UTC by Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account)
Modified: 2015-03-05 10:36 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ca-certificates-2014.1.98-71.el7
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1140729 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 10:36:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:0472 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE ca-certificates bug fix and enhancement update 2015-03-05 15:16:01 UTC

Description Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account) 2014-05-30 14:25:25 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account) 2014-09-03 23:33:53 UTC
I agree this should be done for rhel-7.0.z, too.

Comment 3 Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account) 2014-09-04 15:58:53 UTC
I notice that I had filed a bug 1079056 for 7.0(.z) previously already - but it never got approval flags from devel/qa ... only from PM, which indicates that PM would like to see this rebase for 7.0.z.

What should we do? Clone this one for z-stream and close the older bug? Or work with bug 1079056 for z-stream?

Comment 4 Suzanne Forsberg 2014-09-04 16:16:11 UTC
(In reply to Kai Engert (:kaie) from comment #3)
> I notice that I had filed a bug 1079056 for 7.0(.z) previously already - but
> it never got approval flags from devel/qa ... only from PM, which indicates
> that PM would like to see this rebase for 7.0.z.
> 
> What should we do? Clone this one for z-stream and close the older bug? Or
> work with bug 1079056 for z-stream?

Since this one is already in modified and has all it's acks, let's close 1079056 as a DUP of this one, and I will ask PM to approve this for zstream.

Comment 5 Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account) 2014-09-04 17:07:26 UTC
*** Bug 1079056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 10:36:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0472.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.