Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1113637 - [Doc] Add W2K12 to supported guests.
[Doc] Add W2K12 to supported guests.
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Getting_Started_Guide (Show other bugs)
5.0 (RHEL 7)
Unspecified Unspecified
high Severity high
: ---
: 6.0 (Juno)
Assigned To: Summer Long
Don Domingo
: Documentation, Triaged
: 1122961 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-06-26 10:21 EDT by Stephen Gordon
Modified: 2015-02-11 21:22 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Build Name: 22636, Getting Started Guide-4 Build Date: 25-03-2014 12:25:58 Topic ID: 29486-609994 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2015-02-11 21:22:28 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Stephen Gordon 2014-06-26 10:21:59 EDT
Title: Supported Virtual Machine Operating Systems

Describe the issue:

Add Windows Server 2012 to the supported guest list in line with the RHEL support matrix:

http://www.redhat.com/resourcelibrary/articles/enterprise-linux-virtualization-support

Please also work with the RHEV team to see if we can find a way to share content here to keep these in sync-ish.
Comment 1 Martin Lopes 2014-07-17 21:54:06 EDT
This bug is being assigned to Summer Long, who is now the designated docs specialist for Compute.
Comment 2 Summer Long 2014-07-29 17:59:17 EDT
Definitely need to go through the whole list (SUSE isn't there either).
Comment 3 Summer Long 2014-07-29 18:00:59 EDT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093199, has done part of this work, but not OS types were added.
Comment 5 Stephen Gordon 2014-07-30 08:22:23 EDT
Turns out that link is actually wrong and going to be removed in the near future. Apparently the correct one going forward is https://access.redhat.com/articles/973133
Comment 6 Summer Long 2014-07-31 01:02:12 EDT
*** Bug 1122961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.