Not in such a ratio, but is also evident from the 'network-manager-applet' & 'firewall applet viewpoint'. A video is worth a thousand picture. http://goo.gl/rRGp4W
what window manager are you using?
OK <= gtk3-3.13.2-5.fc21 BKN >= gtk3-3.13.3-1.fc21 $ rpm -q xfwm4 && xfwm4 --version xfwm4-4.10.1-3.fc21.i686 This is xfwm4 version 4.10.1 (revision 3918e6b) for Xfce 4.10 Released under the terms of the GNU General Public License. Compiled against GTK+-2.24.23, using GTK+-2.24.23. Build configuration and supported features: - Startup notification support: Yes - XSync support: Yes - Render support: Yes - Xrandr support: Yes - Embedded compositor: Yes - KDE systray proxy (deprecated): No $ rpm -q xfwm4 && xfwm4 --version xfwm4-4.11.1-1.fc21.x86_64 This is xfwm4 version 4.11.1 (revision UNKNOWN) for Xfce 4.10 Released under the terms of the GNU General Public License. Compiled against GTK+-2.24.23, using GTK+-2.24.23. Build configuration and supported features: - Startup notification support: Yes - XSync support: Yes - Render support: Yes - Xrandr support: Yes - Embedded compositor: Yes - KDE systray proxy (deprecated): No
Lowering the panel a couple of pixels, menus are displayed in full!? 'xfce4-panel-descent.webm' This is just an example to better understand what is happening, do not take this as a solution!
As well as for 'xfce4-panel-descent.webm', the same applies to 'xfce4-panel-borderspace.webm'.
Do you need any more information regarding?
no
Downgrade to workin gtk3 and stay there. Simple.
Somehow I doubt that anything will change for the better in 'gtk3' with regard to this issue, therefore switching component. But there is hope. :)
Somehow I doubt that anything will change for the better in 'gtk3' with regard to this issue, therefore switching component. There is hope. But before any further discussion I would ask Giuseppe, with regard to your question, do you know anything about this issue, as it could help to solve it?
The video from comment 1 seems to be gone. Can you describe in actual words what this bug is? I'm running Xfce in rawhide here, and the firewalld and nm-applets look fine in my system tray. What size and orentation is your system tray? Does the problem persist on a newly created user?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=client+side+decoration https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10631 http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/3.13/gtk+-3.13.3.news * Theming: - Use client-side shadows for menus and tooltips * Bugs fixed: 731187 Use csd shadows for menus For the Xfce this would mean "Bugs produced". :) $ xfconf-query -c xfwm4 -p /general/use_compositing true $ xfconf-query -c xsettings -p /Net/ThemeName Greybird The Shimmer Project - Desktop Suites Initial support for client side decorations - Albatross("CSD" not yet in Fedora) https://github.com/shimmerproject/Albatross/commit/7f4072f - Greybird https://github.com/shimmerproject/Greybird/commit/d7acf73 - Bluebird https://github.com/shimmerproject/Bluebird/commit/259816a This is how I solved it: ~/.themes/Greybird/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css ... .window-frame { border-style: none; border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0; box-shadow: 0 3px 7px alpha(black, 0.7), 0 0 0 1px alpha(black); <- ... .window-frame:backdrop { box-shadow: 0 3px 5px alpha(black, 0.5), 0 0 0 1px alpha(black); <- } And what is really needed is a comment on the whole "window-frame" section. In this way, the problem with the CSD is isolated from the xfce4-panel libsystray.so, i.e. "systray" - notification area where notification icons appear. Capisci, caro fratello.
poma: sorry, but three of us are staring at that last post and it seems to contain words in approximately the right order, but nothing that describes what the actual bug you're seeing is. could you perhaps try again?
http://goo.gl/UUkscD
ok, and do you only see this behavior when you are using greybird? Do any other themes show it?
These are installed and tested, $ grep -R -I -m 1 CSD /usr/share/themes | sort /usr/share/themes/BlackMATE/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/Bluebird/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/BlueMenta/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/Blue-Submarine/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/ContrastHigh/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/DeLorean-Dark/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/GreenLaguna/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/Green-Submarine/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/Greybird/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/Menta/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/Zukitwo/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * /usr/share/themes/Zukiwi/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css: * CSD * also, - Albatross("CSD" not yet in Fedora) - Adwaita(somewhere over the rainbow)
I am seeing this behavior with Adwaita as well ... Hmmm....
Yeah, I don't see it with albatross. So, we need to either update all the affected themes, or get gtk3 to adjust back...
Waiting for Godot, again? :) Happy campers.
http://goo.gl/Ye23cM http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/3.13/gtk+-3.13.7.news
You keep adding unstable links to google drive to this. Frankly, its a waste of everybody's time to keep clicking just to find the one that still works. Please attach your screenshots. In any case, check and radio boxes have changed their behavior slightly, so themes will need a small adjustment: the checked state is now called checked, no longer active. This is not a gratitious change, but allows use to fix actual rendering problems with such widgets in a selected context (e.g a selected listbox row). It is also what the web does, so it must be right.
Created attachment 935217 [details] Catch up gtk3
(In reply to Matthias Clasen from comment #20) ... > In any case, check and radio boxes have changed their behavior slightly, so > themes will need a small adjustment: the checked state is now called > checked, no longer active. ... Well at least thanks for the tip. Fenzi, please check patched theme and if it is a valid I can apply for Albatross & Bluebird. Adam, you could contact maintainers of other mentioned themes. Let's finish with this circus! :)
Albatross - update to 1.7.3 release & catch up gtk3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139187 Bluebird - update to 1.2 & catch up gtk3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139190
Poma - I saw your email on devel@ with patches. With regards to greybird, I can update the patches once the upstream pushes the update ... unless Kevin does it earlier.
It's OK man, thanks.
Created attachment 936321 [details] Greybird - changes related to gtk+-3.13.[3-7]
Why are you closing these bugs deferred? You don't want them acted on?
I'm waiting confirmation upstream. Until then, the bar is closed! :)
Fenzi, you've got the green light.
Ok, now I have very confused. I thought you sent some patches for greybird theme upstream. Further, xfce-4.11.1 is not present in Fedora repos yet. So, changing the title to reflect something not in the repos sounds odd to me. Could you please explain what you are doing here? Thanks!
Left click on the icon - menu doesn't stay open, must hold down the left mice button. gtk3-3.14.1 bug or feature, again!?
This is the epic battle - GNOME(Goliath) vs Xfce(David).
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #30) > Ok, now I have very confused. I thought you sent some patches for greybird > theme upstream. I've provided a patch, but you've decided to wait upstream. "Poma - I saw your email on devel@ with patches. With regards to greybird, I can update the patches once the upstream pushes the update ... unless Kevin does it earlier." Mukundan Ragavan 2014-09-08 22:35:18 EDT Your confusion, only you can explain. :) > Further, xfce-4.11.1 is not present in Fedora repos yet. So, changing the > title to reflect something not in the repos sounds odd to me. When testing I am trying to do with the latest possible version, regardless of whether it is present or not in stock. Besides this bug applies to the "present" version also. Ref. $ rpm -qa garcon\* libxfce4ui\* libxfce4util\* xfce4-about xfce4-appfinder xfce4-dev-tools xfce4-panel\* xfce4-power-manager xfce4-session\* xfce4-session-engines xfce4-settings xfdesktop xfwm4 gtk3\* | sort garcon-0.3.0-2.fc21.x86_64 garcon-devel-0.3.0-2.fc21.x86_64 gtk3-3.14.1-1.fc21.x86_64 gtk3-devel-3.14.1-1.fc21.x86_64 libxfce4ui-4.11.1-2.fc21.x86_64 libxfce4ui-devel-4.11.1-2.fc21.x86_64 libxfce4util-4.11.0-2.fc21.x86_64 libxfce4util-devel-4.11.0-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-about-4.11.1-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-appfinder-4.11.0-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-dev-tools-4.11.0-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-panel-4.11.1-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-panel-devel-4.11.1-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-power-manager-1.3.2-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-session-4.11.0-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-session-devel-4.11.0-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-session-engines-4.11.0-2.fc21.x86_64 xfce4-settings-4.11.3-2.fc21.x86_64 xfdesktop-4.11.7-2.fc21.x86_64 xfwm4-4.11.2-2.fc21.x86_64 $ rpm -qa garcon\* libxfce4ui\* libxfce4util\* xfce4-about xfce4-appfinder xfce4-dev-tools xfce4-panel\* xfce4-power-manager xfce4-session\* xfce4-session-engines xfce4-settings xfdesktop xfwm4 gtk3\* | sort garcon-0.2.1-5.fc21.i686 gtk3-3.14.1-1.fc21.i686 gtk3-devel-3.14.1-1.fc21.i686 libxfce4ui-4.10.0-13.fc21.i686 libxfce4util-4.10.1-4.fc21.i686 xfce4-about-4.10.0-13.fc21.i686 xfce4-appfinder-4.10.1-4.fc21.i686 xfce4-panel-4.10.1-6.fc21.i686 xfce4-power-manager-1.4.1-3.fc21.i686 xfce4-session-4.10.1-6.fc21.i686 xfce4-session-engines-4.10.1-6.fc21.i686 xfce4-settings-4.10.1-5.fc21.i686 xfdesktop-4.10.2-4.fc21.i686 xfwm4-4.10.1-4.fc21.i686
(In reply to poma from comment #33) > (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #30) > > Ok, now I have very confused. I thought you sent some patches for greybird > > theme upstream. > > I've provided a patch, but you've decided to wait upstream. I was hoping at least upstream would say that your patch was the right approach. Did they reply to you on the patches? > "Poma - I saw your email on devel@ with patches. With regards to greybird, I > can update the patches once the upstream pushes the update ... unless Kevin > does it earlier." > Mukundan Ragavan 2014-09-08 22:35:18 EDT > > Your confusion, only you can explain. :) Part of confusion is your tweaking of bugs. Closing. Opening. Changing titles. This all becomes noise that makes it hard to track whats going on.
My recommendation is to immediately applying my patch, after the themes redesign such as Sahoo mentioned, switch to them and that's it. Do not delay this any more. Where is Clasen to explain what's with this new bug?
ok. I will look at applying those tomorrow (unless nonamedotc beats me to it). IMHO there was no need to cc the devel list on your discussion with upstream, but ok. New bug? If you have a new bug, please file it as a new bug, don't add more to this report. Thanks.
Sure, do not forget to close when finished. A new bug: - gtk3-3.14.1 - irregular appearance - firewall-applet systray icons menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149334 - gtk3-3.14.1 - irregular appearance - nm-applet systray icons menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149335
greybird-1.4-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/greybird-1.4-2.fc21
Package greybird-1.4-2.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing greybird-1.4-2.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12492/greybird-1.4-2.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
greybird-1.4-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Created attachment 954603 [details] Upstream fix for checkboxes and radios in gtk3.14 - Upstream fix for checkboxes and radios in gtk3.14 https://github.com/shimmerproject/Greybird/commit/6f8013c - The "shadow" is re-enabled, the full size of the app menu in the system tray is resolved upstream - gtkmenu: fix unnecessary scroll buttons gtk-3-14 https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?h=gtk-3-14&id=695ff38 The same applies to the Shimmer Project Desktop Suites for Xfce as a whole, i.e. Greybird, Bluebird and Albatross. With these two corrections bugs #1114161, #1139190 and #1139187 are solved completely.
Wolfgang, uncomment to restore the "shadow" functionality: <THEME>/gtk-3.0/gtk-widgets.css ... .window-frame[:backdrop] { - Update to the latest git commit d832073 2014-07-20 & catch up gtk3 mate-themes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140423 window-frame box-shadow: enabled -> uncomment! - mate-themes: BlackMATE + ContrastHigh + GreenLaguna + - Update to the latest git commit f41b574 2014-08-10 & catch up gtk3 mate-themes-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140645 window-frame box-shadow: enabled -> uncomment! - mate-themes-extras: Blue-Submarine + DeLorean-Dark + GnomishBeige + Green-Submarine +
Among others, fix for the "shadow" is going to be in a new upstream gtk3-3.14 release next week, and you'll do Fedora builds then as well, right Kalev? https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/log/?h=gtk-3-14 gtkmenu: fix unnecessary scroll buttonsgtk-3-14 Alberts Muktupāvels ...
poma, already done for mate upstream.
(In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #44) > poma, already done for mate upstream. Magnifico!
All three themes are ready, - Greybird here - Bluebird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139190 - Albatross https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139187 Pizza pronto!
greybird-1.4-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/greybird-1.4-3.fc21
Package greybird-1.4-3.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing greybird-1.4-3.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-14706/greybird-1.4-3.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
greybird-1.4-3.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.