Rebase openstack-keystone to 2014.1.1. If appropriate, link any critical issues addressed in this rebase.
Puddle 2014-07-14.1 passed sanity.
Hi Nathan, thanks for the rebase number, but what is really needed is how the rebase impacts the user. What are the main highlights, fixes, or enhancements of the rebase for the user? thanks, Summer
(In reply to Summer Long from comment #5) > Hi Nathan, thanks for the rebase number, but what is really needed is how > the rebase impacts the user. What are the main highlights, fixes, or > enhancements of the rebase for the user? thanks, Summer The upstream 2014.1.1 release was only a bugfix update. Out of the 5 upstream bugs fixed in Keystone for 2014.1.1, there was only one high priority issue (for CVE-2014-0204). We had already included the fix for this issue in the RHEL OSP 5.0 GA, so it should not be called out for this update. I can call out the remaining 4 lower priority bug fixes if you prefer, though we don't have bugzilla numbers to refer to them by. Do we reference Launchpad bug numbers in doc updates?
Thanks, Nathan. No need for the bug numbers, just a short listing that would help the end user to understand what changed would be good. Otherwise, if it's all backend stuff, there's no need for doc text and you can set requires_doc_text to -. Also, referencing the launchpad link is fine since this is a rebase. I've done it in other bugs.
(In reply to Summer Long from comment #7) > Thanks, Nathan. No need for the bug numbers, just a short listing that would > help the end user to understand what changed would be good. Otherwise, if > it's all backend stuff, there's no need for doc text and you can set > requires_doc_text to -. Also, referencing the launchpad link is fine since > this is a rebase. I've done it in other bugs. I've added the bug details. Let me know if you want the Launchpad referenced to be in some other form (like a full link). I've used "(Launchpad #<id>)" for now, but I'm not sure what the convention is on the Doc team.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0931.html