Bug 1122327 - [GSS] (6.4.0) JBoss Marshalling should not require classes for null fields
Summary: [GSS] (6.4.0) JBoss Marshalling should not require classes for null fields
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Remoting
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: DR1
: EAP 6.4.0
Assignee: David M. Lloyd
QA Contact: Jitka Kozana
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1102271 1122329
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-07-23 00:48 UTC by Brad Maxwell
Modified: 2019-08-19 12:44 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of: 1102271
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker JBMAR-161 0 Major Resolved Do not write full class descriptor for fields 2015-05-27 19:11:09 UTC

Description Brad Maxwell 2014-07-23 00:48:05 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1102271 +++

If an object contains a field whose value is null, the field's object type should not be loaded / instatiated since it has no value.

--- Additional comment from David M. Lloyd on 2014-06-30 21:41:13 EDT ---

Clarified the doc text change a bit.

--- Additional comment from Ladislav Thon on 2014-07-10 07:45:19 EDT ---

First, sorry for late notice.

EAP 6.3.0.ER9 contains JBoss Marshalling 1.4.6, which indeed fixes this issue (JBMAR-161), which is why I'm marking this as verified.

However, the customer case linked from this bugs requires additional fixes for JBMAR-162: one fix is included in JBoss Marshalling 1.4.7 and the other was not released in 1.4.x branch yet. So here's the warning: if EAP 6.3 remains on Marshalling 1.4.6, the customer case _won't_ be fixed. (I know there is a one-off patch for 6.2, but providing a warning seems to be a good idea anyway.)

Comment 2 sgilda 2014-07-29 19:33:01 UTC
Based on Bug 1123331: 

Bug Fixes in the Remoting section.
There are two issues duplicated: 1122328 and 1104328 are the same, 1102271 and 1122327 are also the same. Only one of each should remain.

This one is targeted for 6.4, so removing the requires_doc_text flag on this bug.

Comment 3 Kabir Khan 2014-08-26 20:20:38 UTC
Should be fixed by remoting upgrade to 1.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122329

Comment 4 Ladislav Thon 2014-08-27 06:44:36 UTC
Just noting that even though Kabir said "remoting upgrade", it's in fact Marshalling upgrade.

Comment 5 Ladislav Thon 2014-09-17 13:55:33 UTC
Verified with EAP 6.4.0.DR1.1.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.