Bug 1123506 - sddm startup is slow
Summary: sddm startup is slow
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: sddm
Version: 21
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Martin Bříza
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/sddm/sddm/issues/281
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: SDDMDefault
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-07-25 21:02 UTC by Orion Poplawski
Modified: 2015-06-16 16:12 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sddm-0.9.0-2.20141007git6a28c29b.fc21
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-28 06:46:29 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Orion Poplawski 2014-07-25 21:02:35 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2014-07-25 21:09:18 UTC
sddm takes about 15 seconds to start up, mainly in starting the greeter

between:

Greeter session started successfully

and

Message received from greeter: Connect


I at first thought sddm should not try to enumerate all users' face icons at startup, but I'm not sure that that is the hangup.

For comparison, kdm seems to take about 2 seconds to startup.

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2014-10-07 09:26:25 UTC
sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc21

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2014-10-07 09:27:28 UTC
sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc20

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2014-10-07 09:28:20 UTC
sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc19

Comment 5 Orion Poplawski 2014-10-07 18:06:45 UTC
I still see slow startup with sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc21

Comment 6 Orion Poplawski 2014-10-07 19:55:28 UTC
It might be a bit faster, but there is still a noticeable period with a black screen.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2014-10-08 18:57:49 UTC
Package sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc20:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc20'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12308/sddm-0.9.0-1.20141007git6a28c29b.fc20
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 8 Martin Bříza 2014-10-09 11:34:29 UTC
At least from my testing, startup of the greeter itself is WAY faster. Before the update, I got about 20 seconds to get some display. Currently, it's under one second which occurs in the period between plymouth exiting and sddm-greeter starting. In the future, this will be hidden by reusing plymouth's output in the meantime.

Comment 9 Valerio De Angelis 2014-10-10 22:48:36 UTC
Yeah, installed and tested now the version sddm-0.9.0-2.20141007git6a28c29b.fc20.
It's really fast, one second at the maximum.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2014-10-28 06:46:29 UTC
sddm-0.9.0-2.20141007git6a28c29b.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2014-10-31 02:43:10 UTC
sddm-0.9.0-2.20141007git6a28c29b.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Roderick Johnstone 2015-06-16 16:12:17 UTC
I'm seeing sddm slow to display login screen on F22 with sddm-0.10.0-4.fc22.x86_64. Maybe a 20-30 sec delay after logout before getting the login screen. I have homes on nfs mounts and currently one is unavailable.

I assume the F21 package patch is in the F22 package.

Suggestions on how to diagnose would be welcome.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.