Bug 1124806
| Summary: | rhel-osp naming should be used instead of foreman | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Ofer Blaut <oblaut> |
| Component: | rhel-osp-installer | Assignee: | Marek Hulan <mhulan> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Omri Hochman <ohochman> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | Foreman (RHEL 6) | CC: | ajeain, mburns, rhos-maint, yeylon |
| Target Milestone: | ga | Keywords: | UserExperience |
| Target Release: | Installer | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rhel-osp-installer-0.1.8-1.el6ost | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-08-21 18:07:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ofer Blaut
2014-07-30 11:31:55 UTC
*** Bug 1126807 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Marek, 1. If we can give a custom log file, we should re-direct it into a rhel-osp-installer log dir with rhel-osp-installer name 2. Just drop "Foreman" from the provisioning question 2. is fixed as a part of https://github.com/theforeman/foreman-installer-staypuft/pull/64 Verified with rhel-osp-installer-0.1.9-1.el6ost.noarch (1) Log are now under : /var/log/rhel-osp-installer/rhel-osp-installer.log (2) regarding 'drop "Foreman" from the provisioning question' --> The caption looks like : " [root@staypuft yum.repos.d]# rhel-osp-installer Please select NIC on which you want provisioning enabled: 1. eth0 2. eth1" Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1090.html |