RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1129892 - Backport additional qcow2 corruption prevention and image repair patches
Summary: Backport additional qcow2 corruption prevention and image repair patches
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qemu-kvm
Version: 6.6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Hanna Czenczek
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1129893
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-08-13 21:25 UTC by Ademar Reis
Modified: 2015-07-22 06:06 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.469.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1129893 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-22 06:06:43 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Reproduction test log (10.47 KB, text/plain)
2015-05-11 07:04 UTC, Qunfang Zhang
no flags Details
Verification test log (1.57 KB, text/plain)
2015-05-11 07:05 UTC, Qunfang Zhang
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1275 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE qemu-kvm bug fix and enhancement update 2015-07-20 17:49:16 UTC

Description Ademar Reis 2014-08-13 21:25:34 UTC
Via Bug 1004420, we introduced a few "qcow2 corruption prevention" patches.

But there are some recent upstream follow-ups that apparently should be included as well. This BZ is to track it and analyse which of these fixes should be backported.

Right now I see the following two series:



Date: Thu,  7 Aug 2014 22:47:52 +0200
From: Max Reitz <mreitz>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] qcow2: Prevent corruption-related crashes

Max Reitz (3):
  qcow2: Catch !*host_offset for data allocation
  iotests: Add test for image header overlap
  block: Catch !bs->drv in bdrv_check()

AND

Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:01:42 +0200
From: Max Reitz <mreitz>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] qcow2: Fix image repairing

Max Reitz (8):
  qcow2: Factor out refcount accounting for check
  qcow2: Factor out refcount comparison for check
  qcow2: Fix refcount blocks beyond image end
  qcow2: Do not perform potentially damaging repairs
  qcow2: Rebuild refcount structure during check
  qcow2: Clean up after refcount rebuild
  iotests: Fix test outputs
  iotests: Add test for potentially damaging repairs

Comment 5 Jeff Nelson 2015-04-24 20:01:40 UTC
Fix included in qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.469.el6

Comment 7 Qunfang Zhang 2015-05-06 03:11:39 UTC
Hi, Max

We verified the bug 1004420 before with the test case 060 in the qemu-iotests.  So how do we verify this one? Which test cases or what scenarios we should execute? 

Thanks,
Qunfang

Comment 8 Hanna Czenczek 2015-05-06 17:11:12 UTC
Hi Qunfang,

The backport for this BZ includes additions to some iotests, so using them as a basis should be good. Tests with additional test cases are 060, 107, 108, and 114, so these should pass. On the other hand, running these test cases from qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.469.el6 with qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.468.el6 should fail.

Additionally, all tests which passed before the version the fix for this BZ is included in should still pass for qcow2, i.e., a pretty important thing to make sure is that qcow2 still works as before.

I hope this helps,

Max

Comment 10 Qunfang Zhang 2015-05-11 07:04:24 UTC
Created attachment 1024110 [details]
Reproduction test log

Comment 11 Qunfang Zhang 2015-05-11 07:05:05 UTC
Created attachment 1024111 [details]
Verification test log

Comment 12 Qunfang Zhang 2015-05-11 07:06:25 UTC
Setting to VERIFIED according to comment 9, comment 10, comment 11.

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-22 06:06:43 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1275.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.