Bug 1131335 - [RFE][cinder]: Ceph rbd support retype volume
Summary: [RFE][cinder]: Ceph rbd support retype volume
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-cinder
Version: 6.0 (Juno)
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: 7.0 (Kilo)
Assignee: Jon Bernard
QA Contact: Yogev Rabl
URL: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cind...
Whiteboard: upstream_milestone_none upstream_defi...
Depends On: 1121610 1122356
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-08-19 04:05 UTC by RHOS Integration
Modified: 2021-03-11 14:15 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-07 03:02:03 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
OpenStack gerrit 135874 0 None MERGED Add limited retype support for rbd 2020-10-22 18:29:23 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 1365133 0 None None None Never

Description RHOS Integration 2014-08-19 04:05:40 UTC 
Cloned from launchpad blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/ceph-rbd-support-retype.

Description:

Currently ceph rbd doesn't support migrate volume function. This BP add support retype volume function for rbd driver.

Specification URL (additional information):

None
Comment 8 Mike McCune 2016-03-28 22:47:43 UTC 
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions
Comment 9 Mike Burns 2017-06-28 16:48:58 UTC 
This bug appears to have been fixed since 7.0 GA (fixed upstream in 2015.1.0b1 tag).  Is there any reason to not close this currentrelease?
Comment 10 Jon Bernard 2017-06-28 19:53:00 UTC 
Not that I'm aware of.  There are improvements that can be made to the existing implementation but the core feature as described in this bug is complete and functional.
Comment 12 Sean Cohen 2017-12-07 03:02:03 UTC 
(In reply to Jon Bernard from comment #10)
> Not that I'm aware of.  There are improvements that can be made to the
> existing implementation but the core feature as described in this bug is
> complete and functional.

Closing accourdongly
Sean
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.