REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/8739 (cluster/afr: Handle EAGAIN properly in inodelk) posted (#1) for review on release-3.5 by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/8739 (cluster/afr: Handle EAGAIN properly in inodelk) posted (#2) for review on release-3.5 by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/8739 committed in release-3.5 by Niels de Vos (ndevos) ------ commit f67921dec0ab5db6c7c0bc1b00459dbcfa1d568d Author: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu> Date: Mon Sep 15 14:22:44 2014 +0530 cluster/afr: Handle EAGAIN properly in inodelk Problem: When one of the brick is taken down and brough back up in a replica pair, locks on that brick will be allowed. Afr returns inodelk success even when one of the bricks already has the lock taken. Fix: If any brick returns EAGAIN return failure to parent xlator. Note: This change only works for non-blocking inodelks. This patch addresses dht-synchronization which uses non-blocking locks for rename. Blocking lock is issued by only one of the rebalance processes. So for now there is no possibility of deadlock. Change-Id: I07673f8873263da334e03f35c6cdb5db9410a616 BUG: 1141733 Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8739 Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos>
The first (and last?) Beta for GlusterFS 3.5.3 has been released [1]. Please verify if the release solves this bug report for you. In case the glusterfs-3.5.3beta1 release does not have a resolution for this issue, leave a comment in this bug and move the status to ASSIGNED. If this release fixes the problem for you, leave a note and change the status to VERIFIED. Packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update (possibly an "updates-testing" repository) infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-October/018990.html [2] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/
The second Beta for GlusterFS 3.5.3 has been released [1]. Please verify if the release solves this bug report for you. In case the glusterfs-3.5.3beta2 release does not have a resolution for this issue, leave a comment in this bug and move the status to ASSIGNED. If this release fixes the problem for you, leave a note and change the status to VERIFIED. Packages for several distributions have been made available on [2] to make testing easier. [1] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-November/019359.html [2] http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/3.5.3beta2/
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.5.3, please reopen this bug report. glusterfs-3.5.3 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2014-November/000042.html [2] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/