Bug 1155963
| Summary: | Circular dependency with util-linux | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Stephen Quinney <squinney> | |
| Component: | coreutils | Assignee: | Ondrej Vasik <ovasik> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Robert Krátký <rkratky> | |
| Priority: | medium | |||
| Version: | 7.0 | CC: | jscotka, ovasik, pbrady, rkratky | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | coreutils-8.22-13.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Circular dependency between coreutils and util-linux packages removed
A redundant dependency, which was introduced between the _coreutils_ and _util-linux_ packages when utilities were moved from one package to another, has been removed because it was no longer required. The elimination of the circular dependency makes "yum" transactions more predictable.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1155971 1206009 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-11-19 12:44:45 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1110700, 1155971, 1191021, 1205796, 1206009 | |||
|
Description
Stephen Quinney
2014-10-23 09:36:17 UTC
Requirement for util-linux is there to prevent potential loss of su/runuser utilities. We may remove it in RHEL 7, as there this can't happen for sure. (In reply to Ondrej Vasik from comment #2) > Requirement for util-linux is there to prevent potential loss of su/runuser > utilities. We may remove it in RHEL 7, as there this can't happen for sure. Yep, having read the specfile I could see why it had originally been added. It still potentially breaks the correct ordering of installs though so it would be good if there could be a better solution. Thanks, Stephen Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2160.html |