Bug 1157202 - recent RHEL6.5 to 6.6 update breaks qt5 packages
Summary: recent RHEL6.5 to 6.6 update breaks qt5 packages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1153048
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: qt5-qtbase
Version: el6
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Than Ngo
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-10-26 02:55 UTC by Devin Reade
Modified: 2014-10-26 03:36 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-26 03:36:11 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Devin Reade 2014-10-26 02:55:15 UTC
Description of problem:

I've been running RHEL6.5 and using qt5 from EPEL. Recently, the update to RHEL6.6 came through; however I wasn't able to apply it without first uninstalling the qt5 packages from EPEL.  After a successful upgrade to
RHEL6.6, I'm unable to install qt5 from EPEL.  It looks like qt5-qtbase-gui depends on libxcb-icccm.so.1, but RHEL6.6 comes with libxcb-icccm.so.4


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

qt5-qtbase-gui-5.3.2-1.el6.x86_64


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Update to RHEL6.6
2. Try to install qt5-qtbase-gui from EPEL

Actual results:

---> Package qt5-qtbase-gui.x86_64 0:5.3.2-1.el6 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libxcb-icccm.so.1()(64bit) for package: qt5-qtbase-gui-5.3.2-1.el6.x86_64
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: qt5-qtbase-gui-5.3.2-1.el6.x86_64 (epel)
           Requires: libxcb-icccm.so.1()(64bit)
           Available: xcb-util-0.3.6-1.el6.x86_64 (rhel-6-workstation-rpms)
               libxcb-icccm.so.1()(64bit)
           Installed: xcb-util-0.3.6-5.el6.x86_64 (@rhel-6-workstation-rpms)
               Not found
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest


Expected results:

Clean install

Additional info:

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2014-10-26 03:36:11 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1153048 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.