From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 Description of problem: An error in the diskcheck script is reported regularly by cron. An example of the error is listed below. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.5-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install Fedora Core 2 test 1 2.Wait until after diskcheck has run at least once. 3. Actual Results: A Python error is reported Expected Results: No message (unless free disk space was below set warning limits). Additional info: Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:01:00 -0800 From: root@<NAME REMOVED> (Cron Daemon) To: root@<NAME REMOVED> Subject: Cron <root@<NAME REMOVED>> run-parts /etc/cron.hourly X-Cron-Env: <SHELL=/bin/bash> X-Cron-Env: <PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin> X-Cron-Env: <MAILTO=root> X-Cron-Env: <HOME=/> X-Cron-Env: <LOGNAME=root> /etc/cron.hourly/diskcheck: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/etc/cron.hourly/diskcheck", line 318, in ? high += scan_df(list, "Inodes:") File "/etc/cron.hourly/diskcheck", line 245, in scan_df nPct = long(pct[:-1]) ValueError: invalid literal for long():
what does # df -ihP -x none -x tmpfs -x iso9660 -x udf output??
[root@norfair root]# df -ihP -x none -x tmpfs -x iso9660 -x udf Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/hda6 4.1M 364K 3.8M 9% / /dev/hda1 21K 110 20K 1% /boot /dev/hda3 4.9M 568K 4.4M 12% /mnt/gentoo /dev/hda5 4.9M 235K 4.7M 5% /mnt/uml /dev/hdd1 0 0 0 - /mnt/win2k
you may add "-x ntfs" to /etc/diskcheck.conf I will fix the code to not traceback... thx!
Actually, I don't have an ntfs partition, /mnt/win2k is vfat. Adding -x vfat fixed it. I don't know if the -x ntfs will be needed or not.
I just tested diskcheck without the -x ntfs with an ntfs partition mounted and it didn't have any problems.
Actually, that's incorrect. My ntfs partition is always reported as full even when it's not. Someone with a real NTFS partition should probably check it. But at least it doesn't result in a python exception.
win2k is vfat??? so why don't you have any information about the usage??
*** Bug 117257 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Win2k can optionally use vfat or ntfs filesystems, FYI.