Bug 1160310
| Summary: | [Docs] [Install] Requirement to install rhevm-websocket-proxy not listed as an optional prerequisite of installation or upgrade to RHEV 3.3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Robert McSwain <rmcswain> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | rhev-docs <rhev-docs> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Robert McSwain <rmcswain> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | acathrow, adahms, byount, ecohen, gchakkar, juwu, lbopf, lsurette, michal.skrivanek, rbalakri, yeylon, ylavi |
| Target Milestone: | ovirt-3.6.2 | ||
| Target Release: | 3.6.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | docs | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 1062795 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2016-01-24 23:41:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Docs | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1062795 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Comment 1
Andrew Dahms
2015-08-18 23:36:16 UTC
Target release should be placed once a package build is known to fix a issue. Since this bug is not modified, the target version has been reset. Please use target milestone to plan a fix for a oVirt release. this is an automated message. oVirt 3.6.0 RC3 has been released and GA is targeted to next week, Nov 4th 2015. Please review this bug and if not a blocker, please postpone to a later release. All bugs not postponed on GA release will be automatically re-targeted to - 3.6.1 if severity >= high - 4.0 if severity < high Can you help with verifying the docs changes from the link in comment #4 and corrections from description? Assigning to the default assignee and returning to status new to be re-triaged as the schedule allows. (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #5) > Can you help with verifying the docs changes from the link in comment #4 and > corrections from description? current doc about websocket proxy looks good to me, however this is not the point of the original bug description. spice proxy seems updated ok (In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #7) > (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #5) > > Can you help with verifying the docs changes from the link in comment #4 and > > corrections from description? > > current doc about websocket proxy looks good to me, however this is not the > point of the original bug description. spice proxy seems updated ok I think we can closed this based on comment #7 Hi Yaniv, Thank you for the needinfo request. Agreed - I will close this bug, and we will revist the topic of the websocket proxy as the schedule allows to review all content on the topic. Kind regards, Andrew |