Description of problem: # fedup --network 21 --product workstation ... Could not parse metalink https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-install-21&arch=x86_64 error was No repomd file ... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedup-0.9.0-2.fc20.noarch How reproducible: Always Expected results: Function. Additional info: I am not sure about what's supposed to happen in this situation. From what I see inside of the metalink, my gut feeling tells me fedup likely wants to access "repo=fedora-workstation-21&arch=x86_64" instead of "repo=fedora-install-21&arch=x86_64"
This is intentional, and it should be fixed before the final release. See the Common Bugs page for more information: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs#no-fedup-beta *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1160931 ***
(In reply to Will Woods from comment #1) > This is intentional, Well, I fail to understand why this should be intentional? We're in the final testing phase of a release, which should imply all such issues must be fixed ASAP, IMO. > and it should be fixed before the final release. Interesting answer - Earlier today, I found this seems to have been fixed ?!?
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #2) > (In reply to Will Woods from comment #1) > > This is intentional, > Well, I fail to understand why this should be intentional? > > We're in the final testing phase of a release, which should imply all such > issues must be fixed ASAP, IMO. This isn't something I can fix. It's a mirrormanager problem. You should read the Common Bugs page and bug 1160931 if you actually want to understand the problem. > > and it should be fixed before the final release. > Interesting answer - Earlier today, I found this seems to have been fixed ?!? I don't know, maybe it has? I don't control the repos. Talk to rel-eng if you want to know more.
It was fixed two days ago. This is certainly "before the final release". There's a very dull story behind why it got changed when it got changed, that I don't really feel like telling right now, but there are bits of it around the place in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160931 and anaconda-devel-list archives.