Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 116223
im-sdk nvr and source name should include the svn revision
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:10:36 EST
Description of problem: Since we're currently building from the upstream trunk stable subversion repository, I think it would be better to include the head revision number in the source tarball and the package revision number. Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -ql im-sdk-11.4-13.src.rpm | grep bz2 2. rpm -q iiimf-server Actual results: 1. im-sdk-11.4.tar.bz2 2. iiimf-server-11.4-13 Expected results: 1. say im-sdk-11.4.1568.tar.bz2 2. say iiimf-server-11.4.1568-3 Additional info: It's nice to now when the source is changes, and this will also make source maintenance easier I think.
I must suggest a slightly different scheme that would be like fedora Extras package naming policies, and mharris rules. Version: 1.4 Release: X.svnY Where X is the incrementing release number of the package, and Y is the upstream svn revision. Including the revision number in the Version tag may potentially clash, necessitating an Epoch increment. Just hoping to avoid even the smallest chance. Target for FC2 Update on June 14th.
Yu, thanks for changing the tarball filename. :-) Can we also have the svn revision at least in pkg release number as Warren suggested?
Should be fixed in the update for FC2 and in the next devel build.