Spec URL: https://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-fluidity-sm.spec SRPM URL: https://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: State machine implementation for Python objects. Fedora Account System Username: athmane
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/tmp/1169469-python-fluidity-sm/licensecheck.txt [X]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [X]: Changelog in prescribed format. [X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [X]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [X]: Package does not generate any conflict. [X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 6 files. [X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [X]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [X]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [X]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [X]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [X]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3 -fluidity-sm [X]: Package functions as described. [X]: Latest version is packaged. [X]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [X]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [X]: %check is present and all tests pass. [X]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc20.noarch.rpm python3-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc20.noarch.rpm python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint python3-fluidity-sm python-fluidity-sm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- python3-fluidity-sm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python-fluidity-sm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) Provides -------- python3-fluidity-sm: python3-fluidity-sm python-fluidity-sm: python-fluidity-sm Source checksums ---------------- https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/f/fluidity-sm/fluidity-sm-0.2.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 52067d10901a20a024ea59cc7979e520cac78ad89ad7592b7d53f2c43d0cbc3a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 52067d10901a20a024ea59cc7979e520cac78ad89ad7592b7d53f2c43d0cbc3a Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1169469 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG Approuved!
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-fluidity-sm Short Description: State machine implementation for Python objects Upstream URL: https://github.com/nsi-iff/fluidity Owners: athmane Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7
Git done (by process-git-requests).
python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc21
python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.
python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc20
python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.el7
python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
python-fluidity-sm-0.2.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
Hi Othman, I've just picked this package up from being orphaned; is there some reason you packaged version 0.2.0 and not 0.2.1 (which was released in 2011, long before the package review). If it's going to break something, I need to be wary about updating it... Cheers, Paul.
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #11) > Hi Othman, > > I've just picked this package up from being orphaned; is there some reason > you packaged version 0.2.0 and not 0.2.1 (which was released in 2011, long > before the package review). If it's going to break something, I need to be > wary about updating it... > > Cheers, Paul. Hi Paul, IIRC, the version was selected because py-fluidity-sm was a dependency of fabric or py-invoke (prphaned along this), not sure if it's still the case.
It's used by invoke (which is why I'm interested in it, invoke is now a dependency of paramiko). I suspect the reason that you stuck with 0.2.0 is that 0.2.1 was not properly released, and upstream seems to be AWOL: https://github.com/nsi-iff/fluidity/issues/4 I'll stick with 0.2.0 I think. Thanks.