New commit detected on manageiq/master: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/ff12fb2b91f7b0cd948a44a32aee2db7db8e0860 commit ff12fb2b91f7b0cd948a44a32aee2db7db8e0860 Author: Richard Oliveri <roliveri> AuthorDate: Mon Dec 8 16:26:53 2014 -0500 Commit: Richard Oliveri <roliveri> CommitDate: Mon Dec 8 16:26:53 2014 -0500 Remove "initialize" method from StorageManager model. The initialize method of the StorageManager model class was calling super() and in so doing, not passing the proper args to the subclass. Given this was all the method did, the entire method has been removed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171286 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171899 vmdb/app/models/storage_manager.rb | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
New commit detected on cfme/5.3.z: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/gitweb?p=cfme.git;a=commitdiff;h=29bb3e20fdbc7c54243bfa973b5913c5777b7968 commit 29bb3e20fdbc7c54243bfa973b5913c5777b7968 Author: Richard Oliveri <roliveri> AuthorDate: Mon Dec 8 16:26:53 2014 -0500 Commit: Richard Oliveri <roliveri> CommitDate: Tue Dec 9 12:39:02 2014 -0500 Remove "initialize" method from StorageManager model. The initialize method of the StorageManager model class was calling super() and in so doing, not passing the proper args to the subclass. Given this was all the method did, the entire method has been removed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171286 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171899 vmdb/app/models/storage_manager.rb | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
Checked in 5.3.2.3 (5.3.2.5 had issues with netapp installation concerning database, but I checked the source code and the modification is already included). If this was just about adding a Storage manager, then it works as usual. Correct me if I am wrong :)
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0028.html