Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1182481 - Possible to delete ContentViewVersion used by Composite Content View Components
Summary: Possible to delete ContentViewVersion used by Composite Content View Components
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Management
Version: 6.0.6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Brad Buckingham
QA Contact: Tazim Kolhar
David O'Brien
URL: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1122832 sat61-release-notes
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-01-15 09:03 UTC by Peter Vreman
Modified: 2019-08-15 04:11 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-09-15 07:21:35 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1786 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Satellite 6.1.2 bug fix update 2015-09-15 11:20:04 UTC

Description Peter Vreman 2015-01-15 09:03:51 UTC 
Description of problem:
The relation between a Composite Content View and the used ContentViewVersion is not strict. After re-publishing a ContentView and you delete the old ContentViewVersion then the list of Composite Content View components is empty.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create ContentView A
2. Publish ContentView A
3. Create CompositeContentView B
4. Add ContentView A (version 1) to CompositeContentView B
5. Publish CompositeContentView B
6. Publish ContentView A (version 2)
7. Delete ContentView A version 1
8. List Components of CompositeContentView B

Actual results:
List is empty

Expected results:
Delete of ContentView A version 1 is not allowed, not breaking the list of Components of CompositeContentView B

Additional info:
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2015-01-15 09:13:42 UTC 
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.
Comment 3 Justin Sherrill 2015-07-23 14:01:21 UTC 
This is likely a higher priority as it leaves the system in an inconsistent state. 

The delete goes all the way through to the finalize phase (deleting everything in pulp and candlepin in the process), and then errors out.
Comment 4 David O'Brien 2015-08-06 09:09:09 UTC 
Is there any workaround or other advice I can put in a rel note?

thanks
Comment 7 Mike McCune 2015-08-21 03:07:13 UTC 
ACK to the rel-note draft. Looks good
Comment 8 Brad Buckingham 2015-08-24 19:14:54 UTC 
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/11472 from this bug
Comment 9 Brad Buckingham 2015-08-24 19:20:56 UTC 
Katello PR: 
   https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/5439
Comment 12 Tazim Kolhar 2015-08-27 10:23:13 UTC 
VERIFIED:
# rpm -qa | grep foreman
foreman-vmware-1.7.2.35-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman-redhat_access-0.2.3-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-1.7.2.35-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_hooks-0.3.7-2.el6_6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_bootdisk-0.1.2.7-1.el6_6sat.noarch
tyan-gt24-03.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com-foreman-client-1.0-1.noarch
tyan-gt24-03.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com-foreman-proxy-client-1.0-1.noarch
foreman-libvirt-1.7.2.35-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_discovery-2.0.0.19-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman-tasks-0.6.15.5-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-postgresql-1.7.2.35-1.el6_6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman-0.1.4.14-1.el6_6sat.noarch
tyan-gt24-03.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com-foreman-proxy-1.0-1.noarch
foreman-selinux-1.7.2.13-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_docker-1.2.0.20-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-ovirt-1.7.2.35-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_gutterball-0.0.1.9-1.el6_6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_tasks-0.0.3.5-1.el6_6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_docker-0.0.3.9-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-compute-1.7.2.35-1.el6_6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_bootdisk-4.0.2.13-1.el6_6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_discovery-0.0.1.10-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-gce-1.7.2.35-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-proxy-1.7.2.5-1.el6_6sat.noarch
foreman-debug-1.7.2.35-1.el6_6sat.noarch

steps:
1. Create ContentView A
2. Publish ContentView A
3. Create CompositeContentView B
4. Add ContentView A (version 1) to CompositeContentView B
5. Publish CompositeContentView B
6. Publish ContentView A (version 2)
7. Delete ContentView A version 1
8. List Components of CompositeContentView B

Delete of ContentView A version 1 is not allowed, not breaking the list of Components of CompositeContentView B
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2015-09-15 07:21:35 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:1786
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.