Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1182569

Summary: [RFE] Iso domain's attach button should be greyed out with a tooltip when domain is already attached to all available dc's on system
Product: [oVirt] ovirt-engine Reporter: Ori Gofen <ogofen>
Component: Frontend.WebAdminAssignee: Nobody <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Raz Tamir <ratamir>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.5.0CC: acanan, amureini, bugs, gklein, lsurette, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, srevivo, ykaul, ylavi
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Improvement
Target Release: ---Flags: ylavi: ovirt-future?
rule-engine: planning_ack?
rule-engine: devel_ack?
rule-engine: testing_ack?
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-13 11:41:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Storage RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 910354    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
pic none

Description Ori Gofen 2015-01-15 13:37:09 UTC
Created attachment 980498 [details]
pic

Description of problem:

see picture
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Allon Mureinik 2015-01-16 08:06:43 UTC
Einav - does this make sense from a UX perspective (i.e., does it "fit" the rest of the application)?

Comment 2 Einav Cohen 2015-01-16 13:47:35 UTC
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #1)
> Einav - does this make sense from a UX perspective (i.e., does it "fit" the
> rest of the application)?

yes and no :)
this may make sense from a UX perspective, but it is not in line with the rest of the UI. 

we are graying-out buttons only when it is "dead-obvious" to do so (e.g. we will gray out the 'run' button for an 'Up' VM), but if the user will potentially have a hard time understanding why the button is grayed out, we will not do so and block the user from performing the action only when in the dialog context. 

a probably better solution from a UX perspective is to gray-out the button and provide a tool-tipped reason when hovering on it, but it requires an infrastructure which, AFAIK, we don't have / we lost sometime ago (see bug 910354). 

so as for this BZ: I recommend closing it, or turning it to an 'Improvement' BZ that depends on bug 910354. 

thanks.

Comment 3 Allon Mureinik 2015-01-16 13:57:15 UTC
Thanks Einav!

Marking this bug as dependent on bug 910354, and we'll see when (if?) we can handle it.

Comment 4 Allon Mureinik 2015-01-25 17:40:19 UTC
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #3)
> Thanks Einav!
> 
> Marking this bug as dependent on bug 910354, and we'll see when (if?) we can
> handle it.

Resetting target version, as bug 910354 is not targeted yet.

Comment 6 Yaniv Kaul 2017-03-13 11:41:06 UTC
We'd like to deprecate the ISO domain and this is a low priority RFE - closing for the time being.