Hide Forgot
There are hard coded dependancies on some XFree86 subpackages whi need to be fixed before xorg-x11 can be enabled in the development tree. The following is found in the spec file: Requires: XFree86, perl I'm not sure why that XFree86 requires is there, can you comment about that? BuildRequires: XFree86-Xvfb, mozilla, XFree86-devel, XFree86-libs, bzip2 XFree86-Xvfb? What is that used for? ;o) Please remove that dep if possible, unless there is really a need for it. I can make xorg-x11 have a virtual provide for it if it is indeed required though. XFree86-libs needs to be removed. It is unnecessary as a BuildRequires because XFree86-devel requires XFree86-libs already and will do the right thing. The XFree86-devel BuildRequires is ok to keep for now, as we're not going to solve that problem just yet. That will get solved in the future.
I have added: Provides: Xvfb to the xorg-x11-Xvfb subpackage, and also to our XFree86 4.3.0 packaging which will be in all future OS updates. If openoffice still has a dependancy on the Xvfb server, can you please change it to use a virtual BuildRequires: Xvfb instead so that it is implementation agnostic?
Oops, I was looking at the 'openoffice' in cvs rather than the 'openoffice.org'. The Xvfb requirement isn't there, so scratch that. All of the rest of the above issues are fixed in 1.1.0-32, which I'm currently building in dist-fc2
*** Bug 118480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The openoffice.org build I started failed. The build log is over 26Mb in size, and it's beyond my comprehension to investigate the problem without significant time sink, so this will have to be fixed by the package owner most likely.
Mike, build failed because I hadn't gotten around to fixing it this weekend. New OOo is building in dist-fc2 and should contain your fixes. It is looking like it will complete.
This is fixed right? reopen if not.
Yep, fixed in rawhide, thanks warren.