Bug 1200771 - Review Request: takari-lifecycle - Optimized replacement for the Maven default lifecycle
Summary: Review Request: takari-lifecycle - Optimized replacement for the Maven defaul...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: gil cattaneo
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1200762 1200768 1200769
Blocks: 1194362 1200776 1200793 1201270
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-11 11:22 UTC by Mikolaj Izdebski
Modified: 2015-03-12 16:42 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-12 16:42:07 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
puntogil: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-03-11 11:22:20 UTC
Spec URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/review/takari-lifecycle/takari-lifecycle.spec
SRPM URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/review/takari-lifecycle/takari-lifecycle-1.10.2-2.fc23.src.rpm
Description: Takari Maven Lifecycle includes an optimized replacement for the Maven
default lifecycle.  The Takari Lifecycle Plugin is a Maven plugin with
a small set of dependencies that provides equivalent functionality to
five plugins with a large set of transitive dependencies.  This
reduces the download times to retrieve the needed components as well
as the storage space requirements in your repositories.
Fedora Account System Username: mizdebsk

Comment 1 gil cattaneo 2015-03-12 13:55:51 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
  its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
  package is included in %doc.
  Note: Cannot find LICENSE.txt in rpm(s)
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java to
  get additional checks
- Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
  Note: Jar files in source (see attachment)
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-
  built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software'


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 193 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1200771-takari-lifecycle
     /review-takari-lifecycle/licensecheck.txt
    Apache (v2.0) takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/main/java/io/takari/maven/plugins/util/AetherUtils.java
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/maven-metadata
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share
     /maven-metadata
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
     Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
     Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
     pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
     subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
     when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
     utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in takari-
     lifecycle-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

Java:
[x]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.)
[x]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.2.7 starting (python version = 2.7.5)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled yum cache
Start: cleaning yum metadata
Finish: cleaning yum metadata
INFO: enabled ccache
Mock Version: 1.2.7
INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.7
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /home/gil/1200771-takari-lifecycle/takari-lifecycle-1.10.2-2.fc23.noarch.rpm /home/gil/1200771-takari-lifecycle/takari-lifecycle-javadoc-1.10.2-2.fc23.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/ --releasever 23 install /home/gil/1200771-takari-lifecycle/takari-lifecycle-1.10.2-2.fc23.noarch.rpm /home/gil/1200771-takari-lifecycle/takari-lifecycle-javadoc-1.10.2-2.fc23.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: takari-lifecycle-1.10.2-2.fc23.noarch.rpm
          takari-lifecycle-javadoc-1.10.2-2.fc23.noarch.rpm
          takari-lifecycle-1.10.2-2.fc23.src.rpm
takari-lifecycle.src: E: specfile-error pom_remove_plugin: invalid option -- 'r'
takari-lifecycle.src: E: specfile-error error: Unknown option r in pom_remove_plugin()
takari-lifecycle.src: E: specfile-error pom_remove_plugin: invalid option -- 'r'
takari-lifecycle.src: E: specfile-error error: Unknown option r in pom_remove_plugin()
takari-lifecycle.src: E: specfile-error pom_remove_dep: invalid option -- 'r'
takari-lifecycle.src: E: specfile-error error: Unknown option r in pom_remove_dep()
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings.




Requires
--------
takari-lifecycle-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    jpackage-utils

takari-lifecycle (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    java-headless
    jpackage-utils
    mvn(com.github.spullara.mustache.java:compiler)
    mvn(com.google.code.gson:gson)
    mvn(com.google.guava:guava)
    mvn(io.takari.m2e.workspace:org.eclipse.m2e.workspace.cli)
    mvn(io.takari:incrementalbuild)
    mvn(io.takari:takari-archiver)
    mvn(org.apache.commons:commons-exec)
    mvn(org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils)
    mvn(org.eclipse.aether:aether-api)
    mvn(org.eclipse.aether:aether-util)
    mvn(org.eclipse.tycho:org.eclipse.jdt.core)
    mvn(org.eclipse.tycho:org.eclipse.osgi)
    mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-api)
    mvn(xmlunit:xmlunit)



Provides
--------
takari-lifecycle-javadoc:
    takari-lifecycle-javadoc

takari-lifecycle:
    mvn(io.takari.maven.plugins:takari-lifecycle-plugin)
    mvn(io.takari.maven.plugins:takari-lifecycle-plugin:pom:)
    mvn(io.takari.maven.plugins:takari-lifecycle:pom:)
    takari-lifecycle



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/takari/takari-lifecycle/archive/takari-lifecycle-1.10.2.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 2f785803fa6bbfb5804f6706fd46f931a2f6eea6e118032d48469dd1b4299b7c
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 2f785803fa6bbfb5804f6706fd46f931a2f6eea6e118032d48469dd1b4299b7c


Jar and class files in source
-----------------------------
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/jars/commons-lang-2.0.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/classpath-digester/jar/jar-with-index.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/classpath-digester/jar/jar-without-index.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/compile-jdt-classpath/repo-basic/module-b/module-b-method.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/compile-jdt-classpath/repo-basic/module-b/module-b.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/compile-jdt-classpath/repo-basic/module-b/module-b-comment.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/compile-incremental/classpath/module-b/module-b-method.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/compile-incremental/classpath/module-b/module-b.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/compile-incremental/classpath/module-b/module-b-comment.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/compile-jdt-classpath-visibility/test-dependency/test-dependency-0.1.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/compile-jdt-classpath-visibility/test-dependency-bundle/test-dependency-bundle-0.1.jar
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/projects/compile-jdt-classpath-visibility/indirect-grandparent/test-parent/test-parent-0.1.jar


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -vpn takari-lifecycle -m fedora-rawhide-i386
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java
Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

Comment 2 gil cattaneo 2015-03-12 13:57:47 UTC
Issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 193 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1200771-takari-lifecycle
     /review-takari-lifecycle/licensecheck.txt
    Apache (v2.0) takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/main/java/io/takari/maven/plugins/util/AetherUtils.java

- Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/jars/commons-lang-2.0.jar

Comment 3 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-03-12 14:21:06 UTC
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> Issues:
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>      Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
>      "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 193 files have unknown license.
>      Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1200771-takari-lifecycle
>      /review-takari-lifecycle/licensecheck.txt
>     Apache (v2.0)
> takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/main/
> java/io/takari/maven/plugins/util/AetherUtils.java

Fixed license tag, added ASL 2.0 license text.

> - Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
> ./takari-lifecycle-takari-lifecycle-1.10.2/takari-lifecycle-plugin/src/test/
> jars/commons-lang-2.0.jar

Replaced commons-lang-2.0.jar with symlink to system JAR. Other JARs are left because they meet definition of "source code".


Spec URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/review/takari-lifecycle/takari-lifecycle.spec
SRPM URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/review/takari-lifecycle/takari-lifecycle-1.10.2-3.fc23.src.rpm

Comment 4 gil cattaneo 2015-03-12 14:33:38 UTC
APPROVED

Comment 5 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-03-12 14:34:21 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: takari-lifecycle
Short Description: Optimized replacement for the Maven default lifecycle
Owners: mizdebsk msrb msimacek
Branches: f22
InitialCC: java-sig

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2015-03-12 16:23:00 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-03-12 16:42:07 UTC
Built for rawhide. Closing.
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9211051


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.