1201285 – [rgmanager] unused shutdown_wait in postgres-8.metadata

Bug 1201285 - [rgmanager] unused shutdown_wait in postgres-8.metadata

Summary: [rgmanager] unused shutdown_wait in postgres-8.metadata

Keywords:
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias:	None
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	resource-agents
Sub Component:
Version:	6.7
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Priority:	low
Severity:	low
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	6.8
Assignee:	Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
QA Contact:	cluster-qe@redhat.com
Docs Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+	depends on / blocked

Reported:	2015-03-12 13:12 UTC by Patrik Hagara
Modified:	2015-09-10 06:17 UTC (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Clones:	1208647 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-09-10 06:17:10 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)

Links
System	ID	Private	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla	694816	0	low	CLOSED	postgres-8 resource agent does not detect a failed start of postgres server	2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla	917781	0	low	CLOSED	luci should make it explicit that "shutdown_wait" is being ignored at postgres-8 since 6.2	2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 694816 917781

Description Patrik Hagara 2015-03-12 13:12:53 UTC

Description of problem:
shutdown_wait option of cman Postgres-8 RA is ignored by clufter while it could be converted to "stop" option in pcs.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6653eb19834b66b3dde4dafc1e4533e4a00df748 from next branch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. try converting cluster.conf containing postgres-8 resource with defined shutdown_wait timeout

Actual results:
ignored

Expected results:
should be migrated to "stop"

Additional info:
none

Comment 1 Jan Pokorný [poki] 2015-03-12 14:57:26 UTC

If I am not mistaken this is actually a bug in resource-agents:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/584
and hence intentionally omitted in the conversion
(as that parameter had actually no effect in the past).

Comment 2 Jan Pokorný [poki] 2015-03-12 14:58:33 UTC

Alternatively give that parameter a meaning and then it would be
a bug in the conversion/clufter.

Comment 4 Jan Pokorný [poki] 2015-04-01 16:17:58 UTC

This discrepancy introduced with
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/commit/5e026d222796c4a898b9e157c4a90ac15b0206d9
([bug 694816])

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.