RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1204674 - %defattr(755,root,root) no longer applies to directories
Summary: %defattr(755,root,root) no longer applies to directories
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rpm
Version: 7.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Florian Festi
QA Contact: Karel Srot
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1205074 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 997774
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-03-23 10:51 UTC by Patrik Kis
Modified: 2015-11-19 11:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: rpm-4.11.3-10.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 997774
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 11:58:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:2138 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE rpm bug fix and enhancement update 2015-11-19 10:39:52 UTC

Description Patrik Kis 2015-03-23 10:51:42 UTC
This bug also exists on RHEL-7.1:
rpm-4.11.1-25.el7

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #997774 +++

Description of problem:
It appears that when bug 730473 was fixed (just after version 4.8.0-21?), a certain established behavior with the %defattr directive affecting %dir entries (with no %attr override) was broken.  The directive is documented with the following parameters:

    %defattr(<file mode>, <user>, <group>, <dir mode>)

where <dir mode> is optional.  The issue is when <dir mode> is omitted, how does rpmbuild handle a subsequent %dir entry (when no %attr is specified)?  It had previously (at least in el5 and el6 up through 4.8.0-21) applied the <file mode> to directories, as in the following example:

    %defattr(0770, root, root)
    %dir /XXX

The permissions of the /XXX directory in this case used to be set to 770.  After the bug 730473 fix, the above %defattr wouldn't apply to /XXX at all.  Instead, the permissions of this directory in the build install tree would be used (which might fluctuate, depending on the build process umask, etc.)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm-4.8.0-32

How reproducible:
Build an rpm with this minimal spec file

--%<---------------------------------
Summary: foo
Name: mini
Version: 0.1
Release: 1%{?dist}
Group: System Environment/Daemons
License: GPLv2+
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root

%description

%prep

%install
%{__install} -d %{buildroot}/XXX

%files
%defattr(0770,root,root)
%dir /XXX
--%<---------------------------------


Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpmbuild -bb mini.spec
2. rpm -qplv mini-0.1-1.el6.noarch.rpm
3.
  
Actual results:
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Aug 16 02:04 /XXX

Expected results:
drwxrwx---    2 root    root                        0 Aug 16 02:05 /XXX


Additional info:
If you repeat the above test on an el5 system or el6 system with an rpm version up to around 8.4.0-21, you will see the expected results.

Comment 2 Florian Festi 2015-04-08 12:29:56 UTC
*** Bug 1205074 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 11:58:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2138.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.