Bug 1209975 - Civetweb
Summary: Civetweb
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 1.2.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
low
Target Milestone: rc
: 1.3.0
Assignee: Ken Dreyer (Red Hat)
QA Contact: ceph-qe-bugs
John Wilkins
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1210037 1210038 1214518
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-04-08 14:59 UTC by Federico Lucifredi
Modified: 2019-09-12 08:21 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-0.94.1-1.el7cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-24 15:51:26 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1183 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Ceph bug fix and enhancement update 2015-06-24 19:49:46 UTC

Description Federico Lucifredi 2015-04-08 14:59:10 UTC 
In 1.3 we are switching from Apache to Civetweb as the supported HTTP backend in RGW. 

See: https://trello.com/c/4mYZVvii
Comment 1 Federico Lucifredi 2015-04-08 15:00:06 UTC 
looks like we were missing a bug looking at trello today. Added in both tools.
Comment 2 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2015-04-08 17:34:44 UTC 
This feature requires rebasing ceph-deploy to a version that can manage RGW's civetweb configuration. I'll open a new BZ for that.
Comment 3 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2015-04-08 22:33:32 UTC 
Has any documentation been written yet for Civetweb?

I see there is a bit of ceph-deploy documentation, at http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/quick-ceph-deploy/#add-an-rgw-instance , but I can't find any other docs.
Comment 4 Federico Lucifredi 2015-04-08 22:39:45 UTC 
#3 - We aim to not include cep-deploy in 1.3.0, it is only necessary initially for QA to have an installation tool. So a workaround/documentation as to how to carry the install is an acceptable solution if it helps save Ceph-deploy work.
Comment 7 shilpa 2015-06-15 09:09:23 UTC 
Verified in 1.3.0
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-24 15:51:26 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015:1183
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.