Bug 1223892 - Service request to "Reconfigure this service" fails with error
Summary: Service request to "Reconfigure this service" fails with error
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: UI - OPS
Version: 5.4.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.3.5
Assignee: Harpreet Kataria
QA Contact: Nandini Chandra
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1221333 1291707
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-05-21 15:53 UTC by Harpreet Kataria
Modified: 2015-12-15 13:25 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.3.5.1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1221333
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-15 12:55:44 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1223 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE cfme (5.3.5) bug fix and enhancement update 2015-07-15 16:54:20 UTC

Comment 1 CFME Bot 2015-05-22 14:01:03 UTC
New commit detected on cfme/5.3.z:
https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/gitweb?p=cfme.git;a=commitdiff;h=034a6907c1b6c040bc695461059ef508cb4f9329

commit 034a6907c1b6c040bc695461059ef508cb4f9329
Author:     Harpreet Kataria <hkataria>
AuthorDate: Wed May 20 13:16:36 2015 -0400
Commit:     Harpreet Kataria <hkataria>
CommitDate: Thu May 21 15:33:04 2015 -0400

    Made changes to code to not save blank resource action
    
    - Dont add a blank resource action when saving catalog item.
    - Delete empty/blank resource action when user has removed entry point while editing Catalog Item. Changed code that sets entry points to nil when displaying a Catalog Item, it was displaying incorrect values even after entry point was removed.
    - Added spec test to verify blank resource action does not get saved.
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221333
    (cherry picked from commit f194cbd)
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223892

 vmdb/app/controllers/catalog_controller.rb       | 23 +++++++++-------
 vmdb/spec/controllers/catalog_controller_spec.rb | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comment 2 CFME Bot 2015-05-22 14:01:09 UTC
New commit detected on cfme/5.3.z:
https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/gitweb?p=cfme.git;a=commitdiff;h=b833e50b0db529310b1acddc28045cbbd09bff7e

commit b833e50b0db529310b1acddc28045cbbd09bff7e
Merge: e04ce1a 034a690
Author:     Greg McCullough <gmccullo>
AuthorDate: Fri May 22 09:56:33 2015 -0400
Commit:     Greg McCullough <gmccullo>
CommitDate: Fri May 22 09:56:33 2015 -0400

    Merge branch 'bz_53z_1221333' into '5.3.z'
    
    Made changes to code to not save blank resource action
    
    - Dont add a blank resource action when saving catalog item.
    - Delete empty/blank resource action when user has removed entry point while editing Catalog Item. Changed code that sets entry points to nil when displaying a Catalog Item, it was displaying incorrect values even after entry point was removed.
    - Added spec test to verify blank resource action does not get saved.
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221333
    (cherry picked from commit f194cbd)
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223892
    
    @gmccullough please review. https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/2961
    
    See merge request !81

 vmdb/app/controllers/catalog_controller.rb       | 23 +++++++++-------
 vmdb/spec/controllers/catalog_controller_spec.rb | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comment 4 Shveta 2015-07-01 03:43:35 UTC
This feature is not implemented in 5.3.5 build

Comment 5 Sean Myers 2015-07-02 15:40:47 UTC
(In reply to Shveta from comment #4)
> This feature is not implemented in 5.3.5 build

The specific feature in the bug reproducer isn't, but there are still some changes to verify.

Harpreet, I can see that the code changes in the commits referenced above are applied to my 5.3.5 appliance, but beyond that I'm not sure how to verify their functionality via the UI. How do we verify this, since we don't have orchestration templates in 5.3?

Thanks.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-15 12:55:44 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1223.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.