+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #890640 +++ Description of problem: rebalance - rebalance status o/p should be different for 'fix-layout' option, it should not show 'Rebalanced-files' , 'Size', 'Scanned' etc as it is not migrating any files. it should show status of layout fixing. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.3.0.5rhs-40 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a Distributed volume having 3 or more sub-volumes on multiple server and start that volume. 2. Fuse Mount the volume from the client-1 using “mount -t glusterfs server:/<volume> <client-1_mount_point>” 3. From mount point create some dirs and files inside it. 4. Execute rebalance. [root@localhost ~]# gluster volume rebalance defect fix-layout start Starting rebalance on volume defect has been successful 5. check status [root@localhost ~]# gluster volume rebalance defect status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures status --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ localhost 0 0 0 0 completed 10.70.35.173 0 0 0 0 completed 10.70.35.170 0 0 0 0 completed Actual results: it shows 'Rebalanced-files' , 'Size', 'Scanned' etc Expected results: When user has opted only fix-layout this values will be zero and no use of showing those column in status. It can show no of dir for which layout has been fixed or it can show simply status column only. Additional info: --- Additional comment from Scott Haines on 2013-09-27 13:07:32 EDT --- Targeting for 3.0.0 (Denali) release. --- Additional comment from Vivek Agarwal on 2014-04-07 07:41:13 EDT --- Per bug triage, between dev, PM and QA, moving these out of denali --- Additional comment from Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana on 2014-05-06 06:35:12 EDT --- BZs not targeted for Denali.
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10956 (cli: different status output for 'fix-layout' option) posted (#1) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal (sabansal)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10956 (cli: different status output for 'fix-layout' option) posted (#4) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal (sabansal)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10956 (cli: different status output for 'fix-layout' option) posted (#5) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10956 (cli: different status output for fix-layout option) posted (#6) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10956 (cli: different status output for fix-layout option) posted (#7) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10956 (cli: different status output for rebalance fix-layout) posted (#8) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10956 (cli: different status output for rebalance fix-layout) posted (#9) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10956 (cli: different status output for rebalance fix-layout) posted (#10) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10956 (cli: different status output for rebalance fix-layout) posted (#11) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/10956 committed in master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) ------ commit 1b420a3f695a755c6a45b3b74d28c41f7a2d943b Author: Sakshi <sabansal> Date: Thu May 28 11:23:55 2015 +0530 cli: different status output for rebalance fix-layout Change-Id: I6ded40a1b1cff5c72e5b61fd353db3d8c688efd8 BUG: 1225718 Signed-off-by: Sakshi <sabansal> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/10956 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.9.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.9.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-November/029281.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/