Latest upstream release: 2.6.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.4.1-9.fc23 URL: http://www.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/stable2/ This release is required by solr 5.2.1
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23
Looks like 2.7.1 is out now. Does anyone care about hadoop in Fedora or shall we just retire it?
I think there is some interest from other packages, but I no longer have the time to maintain this and the other hadoop related big data packages. I sent out a request for maintainers, but there hasn't been much action. We might have to retire the majority, if not all, of the hadoop related big data packages.
(In reply to Robert Rati from comment #3) > I think there is some interest from other packages, but I no longer have the > time to maintain this and the other hadoop related big data packages. I > sent out a request for maintainers, but there hasn't been much action. We > might have to retire the majority, if not all, of the hadoop related big > data packages. I would to at least co-maintain a few of the Hadoop-related packages. However, I cannot commit to spend too much time on it. As a first step, I may try to upgrade to Hadoop 2.7. Also, I will file a few bugs (e.g., in hadoop-httpfs), and try to propose patches for them.
(In reply to Denis Arnaud from comment #4) > Also, I will file a few bugs (e.g., in hadoop-httpfs) => BZ #1295968
I've taken Hadoop for f24+, but I would be grateful for any help co-maintaining. I'm thinking we should update to the latest 2.7.x in rawhide, but I'm not confident about upgrade paths for users. Can hadoop upgrade from 2.4 to 2.7?
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'.
Created attachment 1259258 [details] Patch for upgrading to Version 2.7.3 The patch is a "git diff" between master and the branch I created to get 2.7.3 to build.
Please, enable hadoop-minikdc module if possible all dependencies (apacheds) now are available
hadoop-2.7.3-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-eb3c8e8f3d
hadoop-2.7.3-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-eb3c8e8f3d
hadoop-2.7.3-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.