From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 Description of problem: I am trying to install the 32 bit (s390) version of fontconfig i.e. fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390.rpm on a 64 bit machine which already has fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390x.rpm installed. I need to do this to satisfy dependancies of a 32-bit app which I am trying to run. A conflict is reported by rpm when I do this. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run "rpm -ihv fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390x.rpm" 2. Run "rpm -ihv fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390.rpm" Actual Results: rpm reports : file /etc/fonts/fonts.conf from install of fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0 conflicts with file from package fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0 Expected Results: It should be possible to install both the s390 and s390x versions on the same machine. Additional info: When I diff the fonts.conf file from the s390 and s390x packages the only difference is: 24c24 < <!-- Font directory list configured on Wed Mar 10 12:17:41 EST 2004 --> --- > <!-- Font directory list configured on Wed Mar 10 12:17:45 EST 2004 --> Since this is just a comment - can it be made to be the same for both architectures please?
Ditto this on rhel3 x86_64
This is bug 118182.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 122793 ***
What is the relevance of bug 122793 "fatal error communicating with the server - Status Code: 404" to this bug? Are you sure you typed in the right duplicate bug number?
Sigh. bug 122973. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 122973 ***
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.