Bug 123579 - fonts.conf conflict between s390 and s390x versions
Summary: fonts.conf conflict between s390 and s390x versions
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 122973
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: fontconfig
Version: 3.0
Hardware: s390x
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Owen Taylor
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 116727
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-05-19 13:57 UTC by Tony Naccarato
Modified: 2014-01-21 22:49 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 19:03:18 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tony Naccarato 2004-05-19 13:57:00 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2)
Gecko/20040308

Description of problem:
I am trying to install the 32 bit (s390) version of fontconfig i.e.
fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390.rpm on a 64 bit machine which already has
fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390x.rpm installed. I need to do this to satisfy
dependancies of a 32-bit app which I am trying to run.

A conflict is reported by rpm when I do this.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run "rpm -ihv fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390x.rpm"
2. Run "rpm -ihv fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390.rpm"

    

Actual Results:  rpm reports :

   file /etc/fonts/fonts.conf from install of fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0 
   conflicts with file from package fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0

Expected Results:  It should be possible to install both the s390 and
s390x versions on the same machine.

Additional info:

When I diff the fonts.conf file from the s390 and s390x packages the
only difference is:

24c24
< <!-- Font directory list configured on Wed Mar 10 12:17:41 EST 2004 -->
---
> <!-- Font directory list configured on Wed Mar 10 12:17:45 EST 2004 -->

Since this is just a comment - can it be made to be the same for both
architectures please?

Comment 1 Seth Vidal 2004-06-21 23:00:19 UTC
Ditto this on rhel3 x86_64


Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2004-07-22 20:55:35 UTC
This is bug 118182.

Comment 3 Owen Taylor 2004-08-03 22:57:05 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 122793 ***

Comment 4 Tony Naccarato 2004-08-04 12:11:13 UTC
What is the relevance of bug 122793 "fatal error communicating with
the server - Status Code: 404" to this bug? Are you sure you typed in
the right duplicate bug number?

Comment 5 Owen Taylor 2004-08-04 14:51:36 UTC
Sigh. bug 122973.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 122973 ***

Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 19:03:18 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.