Description of problem: I saw current bug triaging showing libhif keyword for many bugs. Trying to figure out from where in dnf design workflow libhif is coming into picture. So used following command $dnf repoquery --whatrequires libhif but there is no output. I tried to crosscheck with yum repoquery $ repoquery --whatrequires libhif Yum-utils package has been deprecated, use dnf instead. See 'man yum2dnf' for more information. PackageKit-0:1.0.6-4.fc22.x86_64 PackageKit-0:1.0.6-6.fc22.x86_64 libhif-devel-0:0.2.0-3.fc22.i686 libhif-devel-0:0.2.0-3.fc22.x86_64 libhif-devel-0:0.2.0-5.fc22.i686 libhif-devel-0:0.2.0-5.fc22.x86_64 Why is there difference and not same output? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dnf-1.0.1 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.dnf repoquery --whatrequires libhif 2.repoquery --whatrequires libhif 3. Actual results: both command output are not same Expected results: both command output should be same Additional info:
See bug 1243565. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1243565 ***
Ah! marking bug duplicate is okay but I too have some doubt here not sure this comment will be good place for that. I asked yesterday also on IRC but did not get reply. I raised concern in other bug 1193823 also but no reply. I created this bug with reference to same question but this bug is closed now. Question-> What is the relation of libhif in dnf workflow?
FTR, I recommended Parag to follow the discussion at http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-ecosystem/Week-of-Mon-20150629/000083.html