RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1254334 - Unreliable cpu detection through glibtop
Summary: Unreliable cpu detection through glibtop
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gnome-system-monitor
Version: 6.7
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: David King
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1172231
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-08-17 18:11 UTC by Helio Chissini de Castro
Modified: 2019-07-11 09:49 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gnome-system-monitor-2.28.0-13.el6
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-21 09:08:16 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch for RHEL 6 Gnome (849 bytes, patch)
2015-08-17 18:11 UTC, Helio Chissini de Castro
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:0578 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE gnome-system-monitor bug fix update 2017-03-21 12:23:41 UTC

Description Helio Chissini de Castro 2015-08-17 18:11:30 UTC
Created attachment 1064025 [details]
Patch for RHEL 6 Gnome

glibtop not provides the number of cpus on the machine directly, relying on a list with the current load of each core.

Original code assume that a 0 load core is the end of cpu list, which is invalid in cases of machines with high number of cores, that happens to some cores stay idle with 0 load.

Since this can happens in any core number, if a machine has 192 cores, but the core number 5 has 0 load, then 4 cores will be wrongly reported.

Using standard sysconf api solves the issue in a simple way.

Comment 1 Helio Chissini de Castro 2015-08-17 18:12:40 UTC
Similar bug was opened for RHEL 7.
This one contains the patch for the previous Gnome from RHEL 6

Reference on RHEL 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254332

Comment 6 David King 2016-08-25 16:37:05 UTC
As the patch is already written, this is a very easy fix.

Comment 8 Michael Boisvert 2016-12-20 17:06:16 UTC
While testing a multi-core machine with gnome-system-monitor-2.28.0-13.el6, I was able to see the correct amount of cores listed, as well as the idle cores at 0.0%.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2017-03-21 09:08:16 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0578.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.