RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1265410 - libreswan should support strictcrlpolicy alias for crl-strict= option to support openswan migration
Summary: libreswan should support strictcrlpolicy alias for crl-strict= option to supp...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libreswan
Version: 6.8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Paul Wouters
QA Contact: Jaroslav Aster
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1267370 1271982
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-09-22 20:39 UTC by Paul Wouters
Modified: 2016-05-11 00:15 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1267370 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-11 00:15:57 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:0890 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE libreswan bug fix and enhancement update 2016-05-10 22:49:36 UTC

Description Paul Wouters 2015-09-22 20:39:37 UTC 
[ set temporarily to openswan component, since libreswan component for rhel6 is not yet available in bugzilla ]


libreswan should support strictcrlpolicy alias for crl-strict= option to support openswan migration

The patch for this is trivial (upstream git commit 285f4d9110a)

diff --git a/lib/libipsecconf/keywords.c b/lib/libipsecconf/keywords.c
index f514856..ce72bb1 100644
--- a/lib/libipsecconf/keywords.c
+++ b/lib/libipsecconf/keywords.c
@@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ const struct keyword_def ipsec_conf_keywords_v2[] = {
        { "ocsp-trustname",     kv_config, kt_string,    KSF_OCSPTRUSTNAME, NOT_ENUM },
        { "crlcheckinterval", kv_config, kt_time,     KBF_CRLCHECKINTERVAL, NOT_ENUM },
        { "crl_strict", kv_config | kv_alias, kt_bool,      KBF_STRICTCRLPOLICY, NOT_ENUM }, /* obsolete _ */
+       { "strictcrlpolicy", kv_config | kv_alias, kt_bool,      KBF_STRICTCRLPOLICY, NOT_ENUM }, /* obsolete used on openswan */
        { "ocsp_strict", kv_config | kv_alias, kt_bool,      KBF_STRICTOCSPPOLICY, NOT_ENUM }, /* obsolete _ */
        { "ocsp_enable", kv_config | kv_alias, kt_bool,      KBF_OCSPENABLE, NOT_ENUM }, /* obsolete _ */
        { "ocsp_uri", kv_config | kv_alias, kt_string,    KSF_OCSPURI, NOT_ENUM }, /* obsolete _ */
Comment 3 Ondrej Moriš 2016-03-02 13:11:29 UTC 
Paul, I guess this is included in the released 6.7.4 version of libreswan (3.15-5.el6), is that correct?
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2016-05-11 00:15:57 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0890.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.