Bug 1267390 - VM name missing in chargeback reports
Summary: VM name missing in chargeback reports
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Reporting
Version: 5.5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.5.0
Assignee: Tim Wade
QA Contact: Nandini Chandra
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1283977 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-09-29 21:56 UTC by Nandini Chandra
Modified: 2015-12-08 13:33 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.5.0.12
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-08 13:33:36 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot of chargeback report without VM name (58.02 KB, image/png)
2015-09-29 21:56 UTC, Nandini Chandra
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2015:2551 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: CFME 5.5.0 bug fixes and enhancement update 2015-12-08 17:58:09 UTC

Description Nandini Chandra 2015-09-29 21:56:38 UTC
Created attachment 1078475 [details]
screenshot of chargeback report without VM name

Description of problem:
-----------------------
In chargeback reports,the VM name column doesn't get populated.
This issue is a regression and does not occur in 5.4.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
----------------------
5.5.0.2


How reproducible:
----------------
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
------------------
1.Manage a provider;Enable C&U collection for that provider on the appliance.
2.Generate a chargeback report.
3.

Actual results:
---------------
The VM name column doesn't get populated in chargeback reports.


Expected results:
----------------
The VM name column should get populated in chargeback reports.


Additional info:
---------------
I have marked this bug as high since the VM name itself is missing and there is no way to tell the chargeback rate associated with a VM/instance.

Comment 2 Dave Johnson 2015-10-05 14:47:18 UTC
Nandini, is this specific to 5.5 or are we seeing this in 5.4 as well?

Comment 3 Nandini Chandra 2015-10-05 16:16:12 UTC
This issue is specific to 5.5 and is not seen in 5.4.

Comment 4 Dave Johnson 2015-10-05 16:24:23 UTC
Thanks Nandini

Comment 7 Tim Wade 2015-11-20 20:28:27 UTC
PR: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/5545

Comment 9 Gregg Tanzillo 2015-11-24 15:28:56 UTC
*** Bug 1283977 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Nandini Chandra 2015-11-25 17:13:56 UTC
Verified in 5.5.0.12.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-12-08 13:33:36 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:2551


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.