Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1267483
[DOCS] [3.1] [Feature] Document OpenShift Console Logging feature
Last modified: 2017-03-08 13:13 EST
Display logs (realtime back to a line #) in the OSE console for Builds & Pods (no aggregation / ELK integration).
I think this is related with this Developer Trello Card:
Please review what actual capabilities are being implemented in the final product as opposed to what has been promised by this card.
Can I ask for a QE review of this aggregating logging doc. This link will take you to the PR:
@brice Have added a comment for PR/1129, please help to have a look.
And will verify this bug when the PR is merged.
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs
Merge pull request #1129 from bfallonf/BZ1267483
Bug 1267483 : added file on configuring EFK
The mentioned PR has merged. I have implemented your suggestion.
Let me know if there's anything else, and it can maybe be completed in a follow-up PR.
The below links are unavailable in this Doc:
1) "Create a *secret* for the deployer. The secret can be configured for your instance, but specific for the deployer."
-------- the "secret" link is unreachable
2) "Create the deployer *service account*:"
-------- the "service account" link is unreachable
3) "The EFK stack is deployed *using a template*."
-------- the "using a template" link is unreachable
4) "You can use any volume type, such as *NFS*."
-------- the "NFS" link is unreachable
Others are LGTM.
Were you using the GitHub site to check these, by any chance? Because of the way links work in our docs, they don't work on the GH site, but they work fine on the OpenShift site. You can see it here:
Before we submit a PR and ask for review, we do a local build to check links, etc., so then we know it's ok to submit the PR. It's then available on the GH site, but not the OpenShift site until it's merged, and picked for the next release. (Hope this makes sense.)
Thanks for your explanation, checked the docs on OpenShift site, they are ok, so mark it as verified.
*** Bug 1255592 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***