Bug 1277791 - Upgrading a subset of cluster to 3.7.5 leads to issues with glusterd commands
Summary: Upgrading a subset of cluster to 3.7.5 leads to issues with glusterd commands
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1276587
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: glusterd
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Gaurav Kumar Garg
QA Contact: storage-qa-internal@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1276029 1276643
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-11-04 04:51 UTC by Gaurav Kumar Garg
Modified: 2016-06-05 23:38 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1276643
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-04 04:56:46 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Gaurav Kumar Garg 2015-11-04 04:51:37 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1276643 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1276029 +++

This is extract from mail that a user(David Robinson) sent on gluster-users.

Description of problem:

I have a replica pair setup that I was trying to upgrade from 3.7.4 to 3.7.5. 
After upgrading the rpm packages (rpm -Uvh *.rpm) and rebooting one of the nodes, I am now receiving the following:
 
[root@frick01 log]# gluster volume status
Staging failed on frackib01.corvidtec.com. Please check log file for details.
 

[root@frick01 log]# gluster volume info
 
Volume Name: gfs
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: abc63b5c-bed7-4e3d-9057-00930a2d85d3
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
Transport-type: tcp,rdma
Bricks:
Brick1: frickib01.corvidtec.com:/data/brick01/gfs
Brick2: frackib01.corvidtec.com:/data/brick01/gfs
Options Reconfigured:
storage.owner-gid: 100
server.allow-insecure: on
performance.readdir-ahead: on
server.event-threads: 4
client.event-threads: 4

How reproducible:
Reported by multiple users.

Logs have been attached.

--- Additional comment from Raghavendra Talur on 2015-10-28 08:47 EDT ---

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-10-30 07:25:29 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12473 (glusterd: move new feature (tiering) enum op to the last of the array) posted (#1) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg)

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-11-02 01:54:01 EST ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12473 (glusterd: move new feature (tiering) enum op to the last of the array) posted (#2) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg)

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-11-02 05:28:36 EST ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12473 (glusterd: move new feature (tiering) enum op to the last of the array) posted (#3) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg)

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-11-02 08:01:31 EST ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12473 (glusterd: move new feature (tiering) enum op to the last of the array) posted (#4) for review on master by Gaurav Kumar Garg (ggarg)

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2015-11-03 00:56:58 EST ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/12473 (glusterd: move new feature (tiering) enum op to the last of the array) posted (#5) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

Comment 1 Gaurav Kumar Garg 2015-11-04 04:53:10 UTC
downstream patch url for this bug: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/60757

Comment 2 Gaurav Kumar Garg 2015-11-04 04:56:46 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1276587 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.