Bug 1279543
| Summary: | cinder-api is consuming around 10GB RAM when running a "snapshot-list" command on the large set of data | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Eric Harney <eharney> |
| Component: | openstack-cinder | Assignee: | Gorka Eguileor <geguileo> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | lkuchlan <lkuchlan> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 6.0 (Juno) | CC: | adahms, eharney, fpercoco, geguileo, jobernar, jschluet, nlevinki, scohen, sgotliv, yeylon |
| Target Milestone: | async | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | 6.0 (Juno) | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-cinder-2014.2.3-11.el7ost | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Previously, the Block Storage service would calculate filters, limits, and offset locally instead of in the database. This would result in a large amount of memory being required to perform these calculations because all non-deleted entries in the database would need to be retrieved. With this update, these calculations are now performed in the database, and only the data to be listed are retrieved.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 1278576 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2016-01-21 13:54:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Eric Harney
2015-11-09 17:10:44 UTC
*** Bug 1279561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Tested using: python-cinder-2014.2.3-11.el7ost.noarch python-cinderclient-1.1.1-1.el7ost.noarch openstack-cinder-2014.2.3-11.el7ost.noarch Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0059.html |