Bug 129587 - [PATCH] redhat-rpm-config doesn't understand armv5te[bl] architecture
Summary: [PATCH] redhat-rpm-config doesn't understand armv5te[bl] architecture
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: redhat-rpm-config
Version: rawhide
Hardware: xscale
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Elliot Lee
QA Contact:
Keywords: EasyFix, Patch
Depends On: 129034
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2004-08-10 16:54 UTC by Lennert Buytenhek
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
0 users

Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-08-23 16:35:23 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Suggested fix. (1.11 KB, patch)
2004-08-10 16:55 UTC, Lennert Buytenhek
no flags Details | Diff
Suggested fix, updated. (1.12 KB, patch)
2004-08-24 01:17 UTC, Lennert Buytenhek
no flags Details | Diff

Description Lennert Buytenhek 2004-08-10 16:54:38 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510

Description of problem:
1. config.guess in redhat-rpm-config package forces the host triple on
arm platforms to be arm*-unknown-linux-gnu, even though it uses
${VENDOR:-unknown} as second component for other architectures.

2. rpmrc in redhat-rpm-config doesn't know about armv5te(b) optflags.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Comment 1 Lennert Buytenhek 2004-08-10 16:55:38 UTC
Created attachment 102580 [details]
Suggested fix.

Comment 2 Elliot Lee 2004-08-23 16:35:23 UTC

Before the patch can be applied, rpm itself needs to learn about the
armv5te arch. Please re-open this bug once that's taken care of...

Comment 3 Lennert Buytenhek 2004-08-24 01:17:08 UTC
Created attachment 103011 [details]
Suggested fix, updated.

The little-endian arch is more appropriately named armv5tel, update patch to
reflect this.

Comment 4 Lennert Buytenhek 2004-08-24 01:19:52 UTC
OK, perhaps you can help me with that.  Bug #129034 details the
necessary changes to RPM, and I've tried to send that upstream, but no
luck yet.  Mail to {ewt,marc}@redhat.com bounces, mail to jbj@jbj.org
seems to end up in a black hole.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.