Bug 1296867 - SELinux man pages are placed in -devel subpackage instead of -doc subpackage.
Summary: SELinux man pages are placed in -devel subpackage instead of -doc subpackage.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 7.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Lukas Vrabec
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1266555 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1292790
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-01-08 09:53 UTC by Miroslav Grepl
Modified: 2016-11-04 02:40 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.13.1-80.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 02:40:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:2283 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2016-11-03 13:36:25 UTC

Description Miroslav Grepl 2016-01-08 09:53:04 UTC 
Description of problem:

SELinux man pages for services are placed in selinux-policy-devel package instead of selinux-policy-targeted package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

rpm -qf /usr/share/man/man8/httpd_selinux.8.gz 
selinux-policy-devel-3.13.1-50.el7.noarch
Comment 2 Lukas Vrabec 2016-03-19 21:55:28 UTC 
*** Bug 1266555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 lejeczek 2016-03-21 16:04:10 UTC 
I'll vote - as in bug report - to put them in default/main package, no doc. These are very important in my mind. Admins will be looking straight for selinux man pages even on minimal installations, and doc part does not come by default.
Comment 4 Mike McCune 2016-03-28 22:59:28 UTC 
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions
Comment 7 Lukas Vrabec 2016-06-16 12:08:25 UTC 
Milos, could you test it with the latest build? I would say it's fixed.
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 02:40:08 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2283.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.