Bug 1302508 - [Docs] [RFE] Gateway setting for non-management networks lacks explanation in Administration Guide.
Summary: [Docs] [RFE] Gateway setting for non-management networks lacks explanation in...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1302509
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 3.5.7
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: rhev-docs@redhat.com
QA Contact: rhev-docs@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard: docs
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-01-28 02:30 UTC by Germano Veit Michel
Modified: 2016-02-02 12:11 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-02 12:11:45 UTC
oVirt Team: Docs
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Germano Veit Michel 2016-01-28 02:30:39 UTC
Description of problem:

In RHEV-M GUI, if we fill the Gateway setting the management network this address is used for the default route.

However, if we fill it for non-management networks, we are actually setting up source based routing by using special routing tables and ip rules to instruct the kernel to look at specific tables in the FIB for packets which have specific source-IP/interfaces. See: http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Multiple_Gateways

Our documentation in https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.5/html/Administration_Guide/sect-Hosts_and_Networking.html (section 7.6.2. Editing Host Network Interfaces and Assigning Logical Networks to Hosts) does not mention this important detail. 

So people fill the gateway option for non management networks and expect that gateway to be the default route for the Host. But it is not since it's only valid for forwarding (not in use) or reply packets arriving from that Network (some conntrack magic here I suppose).

So I suggest we put a note in there to link some other part of the documentation or to explain these differences.

I haven't confirmed this in 3.6 but I suppose it's the same.

Cheers,
Germano

Comment 2 Andrew Dahms 2016-02-02 12:11:45 UTC
Closing as a duplicate of BZ#1302509.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1302509 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.