Bug 1308415 - DHT : for many operation directory/file path is '(null)' in brick log
Summary: DHT : for many operation directory/file path is '(null)' in brick log
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: distribute
Version: 3.7.7
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sakshi
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1231264
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-02-15 06:48 UTC by Sakshi
Modified: 2016-08-01 01:22 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.7.9
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1231264
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-15 05:14:55 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sakshi 2016-02-15 06:48:20 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1231264 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1031016 +++

Description of problem:
In case of DHT volume, brick logs has '(null)' as a path for operations like OPENDIR, MKDIR, MKNOD, SETXATTR

e.g
log snippet from brick

[2013-11-14 01:52:01.592994] I [server-rpc-fops.c:705:server_opendir_cbk] 0-dht-server: 61510: OPENDIR (null) (16bb3787-361d-4977-8c66-
a62b8d2f70a3) ==> (No such file or directory)
[2013-11-14 03:14:56.011608] I [server-rpc-fops.c:528:server_mkdir_cbk] 0-dht-server: 32254: MKDIR (null) (00000000-0000-0000-0000-0000
00000001/{1.1000000}) ==> (File exists)
[2013-11-14 03:18:18.304290] I [server-rpc-fops.c:438:server_access_cbk] 0-dht-server: 47194: ACCESS (null) (2d0887f8-358d-4758-949f-db
bd06d67265) ==> (No such file or directory)
[2013-11-14 03:18:18.317609] I [server-rpc-fops.c:705:server_opendir_cbk] 0-dht-server: 47197: OPENDIR (null) (2d0887f8-358d-4758-949f-
dbbd06d67265) ==> (No such file or directory)
...
[2013-11-14 06:32:14.172144] I [server-rpc-fops.c:898:_gf_server_log_setxattr_failure] 0-dht-server: 164153: SETXATTR (null) (85258d5e-
fde6-4452-a4cf-71ef0568129a) ==> trusted.glusterfs.dht
[2013-11-14 06:32:14.174551] I [server-rpc-fops.c:528:server_mkdir_cbk] 0-dht-server: 285540: MKDIR (null) (00000000-0000-0000-0000-000
000000001/118) ==> (File exists)
[2013-11-14 06:32:14.202874] I [server-rpc-fops.c:575:server_mknod_cbk] 0-dht-server: 285551: MKNOD (null) (bf070eaf-2822-40b7-ab44-24d
91926db45/f7) ==> (File exists)

In most of the cases reason  is '(File exists)' or ' (No such file or directory)'


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
============================================================= 
3.4.0.44rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64



How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1.create DHT volume and mout it using FUSE and NFS
2. create, delete files/Directories from both mount point simultaneously.
3. Keep checking logs.

Actual results:
for many operation directory/file path is  '(null)' in brick  log 

Expected results:
It should show path of that Dir/file

Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Amar Tumballi on 2013-12-02 05:09:24 EST ---

(null) in here is the 'path' of the file. Yes it could have not been printed at all as a proper fix.

Above there are two type of operations:

inode ops (Access, opendir etc), where there is a log of 'gfid' which can help people to debug. (Also, these calls may be also path less, gfid only fops)..

in entry ops: (mkdir and mknod), the gfid of parent, and basename is logged to help debugging.

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-12 10:16:27 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11206 (dht: remove 'null' for directory/file path from brick log for many operations) posted (#1) for review on master by Sakshi Bansal (sabansal)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-08-13 02:04:55 EDT ---

COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/11206 committed in master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) 
------
commit 546f66f546a9c9f63c4ee7d3f28fc3a494305263
Author: Sakshi <sabansal>
Date:   Fri Jun 12 19:42:30 2015 +0530

    dht: remove 'null' for directory/file path from brick log for many operations
    
    Change-Id: I39cd2089240c0ad62b749f176847cc5337e57f73
    BUG: 1231264
    Signed-off-by: Sakshi <sabansal>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/11206
    Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana>
    Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>

Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2016-02-15 06:50:12 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13445 (dht: remove 'null' for directory/file path from brick log for many operations) posted (#1) for review on release-3.7 by Sakshi Bansal

Comment 2 Vijay Bellur 2016-02-23 08:28:32 UTC
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/13445 committed in release-3.7 by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) 
------
commit a4f509964acf3eff857a32186afc23745054beb4
Author: Sakshi <sabansal>
Date:   Fri Jun 12 19:42:30 2015 +0530

    dht: remove 'null' for directory/file path from brick log for many operations
    
    Backport of http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11206/
    
    > Change-Id: I39cd2089240c0ad62b749f176847cc5337e57f73
    > BUG: 1231264
    > Signed-off-by: Sakshi <sabansal>
    > Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/11206
    > Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    > Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana>
    > Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>
    
    BUG: 1308415
    Change-Id: I161844d3b419a8b5fb0300969e54f2ac9182534d
    Signed-off-by: Sakshi <sabansal>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13445
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com>
    Reviewed-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp>

Comment 3 Kaushal 2016-04-19 07:23:31 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.9, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.9 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-March/025922.html
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.