Hide Forgot
This BZ will track the QE and Docs for deploying RGW with the new Multisite v2 architecture for disaster recovery use-cases between two sites. As an admin, I deploy a master site which my end-users read and write objects to via RGW. As an admin, I deploy a second site for disaster recovery purposes and slave all RGW content from the master site but does not receive end-user read or writes. As an an admin, I manually choose to failover to the secondary site via a change to DNS for my end-users. As an admin, I recover the failed site and resync it with the backup site and restore it to being master.
Is this a dup of 1265797?
*** Bug 1263292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Ref doc: http://10.34.3.139:8080/view/Ceph/job/doc-Red_Hat_Ceph_Storage_2-Object_Gateway%20-%20RHEL%20%28html-single%29/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/RHEL/index.html#_configuring_a_master_zone In the section "Create a Master Zone", the zone should be configured with an endpoint: #radosgw-admin zone create --rgw-zonegroup={zone-group-name} --rgw-zone={zone-name} --master --default Should be changed to: #radosgw-admin zone create --rgw-zonegroup={zone-group-name} --endpoints=http://rgw1:80 --rgw-zone={zone-name} --master --default
The document changes asked here are being followed up in a separate doc bug ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321892 ). And as of APDR, the functionality is working fine. So moving this bug to verified state.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1755