Bug 1314867 - [RFE][L-8] Custom Method Log Location
[RFE][L-8] Custom Method Log Location
Status: NEW
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Automate (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Unspecified
medium Severity medium
: GA
: 5.10.0
Assigned To: bascar
Dave Johnson
: FutureFeature, RFE
: 1314868 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2016-03-04 12:46 EST by Dustin Scott
Modified: 2018-05-04 15:39 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Dustin Scott 2016-03-04 12:46:42 EST
-What is the nature and description of the request?
Customer requests the ability to input their own log location when using the $evm.log method.  As well as display the method execution time on both entry/exit without having to manually add via log timestamps and/or writing custom code to display the method execution time.
-Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Ease of troubleshooting.
-How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Another parameter to pass into $evm.log, e.g. $evm.log(:info, 'Message', 'method.log') that would place the file under the /var/www/miq/vmdb/log directory (or a new directory possibly /var/www/miq/vmdb/log/methods/).
-For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
View the log messages and verify they are being placed in the input location.  View the timestamps and ensure method execution time is displayed.
-Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?
I have not found one.
-Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL5, RHEL6)?
Before the customer goes into production.  This is tentatively scheduled for now depending on the success of the current implementation in development.
-Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?
Yes, sales in involved.  Input pending depending on future meeting.
-List any affected packages or components.
Comment 2 Dustin Scott 2016-03-04 13:00:11 EST
*** Bug 1314868 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.