+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1317361 +++ Description of problem: Do not allow directory creations without gfids as it is a pain to fix the gfids. After the directories are created, operations on them fail anyway. So it is better to fail mkdir. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-03-14 02:16:36 EDT --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13690 (storage/posix: Fail mkdir without gfid-req) posted (#1) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-03-14 03:18:26 EDT --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13690 (dht/afr/client/posix: Fail mkdir without gfid-req) posted (#2) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-03-15 02:03:09 EDT --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13690 (dht/afr/client/posix: Fail mkdir without gfid-req) posted (#3) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-03-16 02:29:39 EDT --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13690 (dht/afr/client/posix: Fail mkdir without gfid-req) posted (#4) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-03-16 03:39:29 EDT --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13690 (dht/afr/client/posix: Fail mkdir without gfid-req) posted (#5) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-03-16 09:36:09 EDT --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13690 (dht/afr/client/posix: Fail mkdir without gfid-req) posted (#6) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) --- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-03-18 08:00:11 EDT --- REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13776 (features/trash: wind mkdir with special pid) posted (#1) for review on master by Anoop C S (anoopcs)
Patch posted : https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/69979/
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions
Moving this bug to verified based on comment 8, as the issue reported isn't seen during regression testing.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1240